Recently there was a commentary in the local paper against capping lawsuits against Nursing Homes, Hospitals, Doctors etc. The author belived his mother to have been ignored.
It is sad to lose a mother. It is especially tragic when it may have been avoided, at that time at least. It is inexcusable when neglect and carelessness adds to or causes the suffering and/or death. And it may be criminal.
Nursing home care is not the only place where the elderly are not treated as they should be. Remembering my parents’ experience with doctors leads me and my two sisters to believe a lot of and maybe most doctors are not as inquisitive as they should be because the patient is old. As Mr. Fly verifies the elderly are often ignored because the doctors believe they are just looking for attention. Aches and pains, while possibly serious and life threatening, are often overlooked because aches and pains are part of getting old. Tests look for the obvious and other possibilities are not considered, because the patient is old.
BUT, that is not reason enough to cause the rest of us to pay higher prices for nursing home care or for doctor care.
I have no idea what Mr. Fly’s mother was paying for care but would we be willing to pay double the amount, triple the amount, how about ten times the amount?
All law suits must have a cap and a time limit for payout. Why should the family of the “victim”, with wise investment of a settlement live their lives in luxury? Why should their children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and on down the line, not have to work a day in their lives while the rest of us pay higher prices for health care, medical care, health insurance, and medical insurance?
There are good nursing homes. It is mandatory for families to stay in touch with the patients as well as the workers as well as the administrators.
Recently a friend mentioned how curious it was that two parents can care for twelve children but twelve children cannot care for two parents.
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Thursday, February 28, 2008
We Can Always Return to the Iceberg Strategy
Social Security
Recently I read an article by Anya Kamenetz, if that is not a Northern European name what is, on the looming Social Security disaster. She mentions:
In 1972 social security was tied to the growth in wages COLA, Cost of Living Adjustment. When wages go up benefits go up, not allowing reserves to build up.
She continues:
We can always learn from history. In the 1800s Alaskan Inuit set their grandparents adrift on icebergs and wave goodbye. We should hurry before Global Warming wipes out our retirement options….
Recently I read an article by Anya Kamenetz, if that is not a Northern European name what is, on the looming Social Security disaster. She mentions:
The shaky economics of the program became apparent with the first beneficiary; a legal secretary from Vermont named Ida Mae Fuller. From the age 63 to 65, Fuller paid 1% of her income into the system --- a total of $24.75. She lived to be 100 years old and collected a grand total of $22,888.92 in benefits. In other words Ida made a 100,000% return on her social security investment. According to the Congressional Budget Office, Americans born between 1876 and 1937 will receive a total of $8.1 trillion more from the social security system than they paid into it.
In 1972 social security was tied to the growth in wages COLA, Cost of Living Adjustment. When wages go up benefits go up, not allowing reserves to build up.
She continues:
In October 2007, a New Jersey school teacher named Kathleen Casey-Kirschling retired and became the first of the 80 million Baby Boomers to file for social security benefits. Right now there are about 3.4 workers paying into social security for every one retiree. But as the Baby Boomers leave the workforce, that will change. By 2030, there will be 2.2 workers per retiree. In other words the system won’t be able to sustain itself, and the pyramid will start to tip over. … In previous eras, old age and poverty went hand in hand. But in postwar America it is rare. … Today less than 10% of the elderly live below the poverty line. Without social security it would be 40%.Alan Greenspan designed a bailout plan that raised payroll taxes, cut benefits, shifted the retirement age from 65 to 67, and taxed social security benefits of the rich. Signed into law by President Reagan in 1983, the Greenspan package worked. Social security began to run up a sizable surplus. … according to the plan, the surplus went into a “trust fund’ to help pay for the retirement of future generations.
… During the 2000 presidential campaign George W Bush and Al Gore promised repeatedly to stop “raiding the trust fund.”Nevertheless, … Bush used the social security surplus to cover government expenses. By early 2007, the Bush administration had spent $1 trillion of social security money at the rate or $500 million per day.
We can always learn from history. In the 1800s Alaskan Inuit set their grandparents adrift on icebergs and wave goodbye. We should hurry before Global Warming wipes out our retirement options….
Thursday, February 21, 2008
In election 2008, don’t forget Angry White Man
There is a great amount of interest in this year’s presidential elections, as everybody seems to recognize that our next president has to be a lot better than George Bush. The Democrats are riding high with two groundbreaking candidates — a woman and an African-American — while the conservative Republicans are in a quandary about their party’s nod to a quasi-liberal maverick, John McCain.
Each candidate is carefully pandering to a smorgasbord of special-interest groups, ranging from gay, lesbian and transgender people to children of illegal immigrants to working mothers to evangelical Christians.
There is one group no one has recognized, and it is the group that will decide the election: the Angry White Man. The Angry White Man comes from all economic backgrounds, from dirt-poor to filthy rich. He represents all geographic areas in America, from urban sophisticate to rural redneck, deep South to mountain West, left Coast to Eastern Seaboard.
His common traits are that he isn’t looking for anything from anyone — just the promise to be able to make his own way on a level playing field. In many cases, he is an independent businessman and employs several people. He pays more than his share of taxes and works hard.
The victimhood syndrome buzzwords — “disenfranchised,” “marginalized” and “voiceless” — don’t resonate with him. “Press ‘one’ for English” is a curse-word to him. He’s used to picking up the tab, whether it’s the company Christmas party, three sets of braces, three college educations or a beautiful wedding.
He believes the Constitution is to be interpreted literally, not as a “living document” open to the whims and vagaries of a panel of judges who have never worked an honest day in their lives.
The Angry White Man owns firearms, and he’s willing to pick up a gun to defend his home and his country. He is willing to lay down his life to defend the freedom and safety of others, and the thought of killing someone who needs killing really doesn’t bother him.
The Angry White Man is not a metrosexual, a homosexual or a victim. Nobody like him drowned in Hurricane Katrina — he got his people together and got the hell out, then went back in to rescue those too helpless and stupid to help themselves, often as a police officer, a National Guard soldier or a volunteer firefighter.
His last name and religion don’t matter. His background might be Italian, English, Polish, German, Slavic, Irish, or Russian, and he might have Cherokee, Mexican, or Puerto Rican mixed in, but he considers himself a white American.
He’s a man’s man, the kind of guy who likes to play poker, watch football, hunt white-tailed deer, call turkeys, play golf, spend a few bucks at a strip club once in a blue moon, change his own oil and build things. He coaches baseball, soccer and football teams and doesn’t ask for a penny. He’s the kind of guy who can put an addition on his house with a couple of friends, drill an oil well, weld a new bumper for his truck, design a factory and publish books. He can fill a train with 100,000 tons of coal and get it to the power plant on time so that you keep the lights on and never know what it took to flip that light switch.
Women either love him or hate him, but they know he’s a man, not a dishrag. If they’re looking for someone to walk all over, they’ve got the wrong guy. He stands up straight, opens doors for women and says “Yes, sir” and “No, ma’am.”
He might be a Republican and he might be a Democrat; he might be a Libertarian or a Green.
He knows that his wife is more emotional than rational, and he guides the family in a rational manner.
He’s not a racist, but he is annoyed and disappointed when people of certain backgrounds exhibit behavior that typifies the worst stereotypes of their race. He’s willing to give everybody a fair chance if they work hard, play by the rules and learn English.
Most important, the Angry White Man is pissed off. When his job site becomes flooded with illegal workers who don’t pay taxes and his wages drop like a stone, he gets righteously angry. When his job gets shipped overseas, and he has to speak to some incomprehensible idiot in India for tech support, he simmers. When Al Sharpton comes on TV, leading some rally for reparations for slavery or some such nonsense, he bites his tongue and he remembers. When a child gets charged with carrying a concealed weapon for mistakenly bringing a penknife to school, he takes note of who the local idiots are in education and law enforcement.
He also votes, and the Angry White Man loathes Hillary Clinton. Her voice reminds him of a shovel scraping a rock. He recoils at the mere sight of her on television. Her very image disgusts him, and he cannot fathom why anyone would want her as their leader. It’s not that she is a woman. It’s that she is who she is. It’s the liberal victim groups she panders to, the “poor me” attitude that she represents, her inability to give a straight answer to an honest question, his tax dollars that she wants to give to people who refuse to do anything for themselves.
There are many millions of Angry White Men. Four million Angry White Men are members of the National Rifle Association, and all of them will vote against Hillary Clinton, just as the great majority of them voted for George Bush.
He hopes that she will be the Democratic nominee for president in 2008, and he will make sure that she gets beaten like a drum.
Gary Hubbell is a regular columnist with the Aspen Times Weekly.
Each candidate is carefully pandering to a smorgasbord of special-interest groups, ranging from gay, lesbian and transgender people to children of illegal immigrants to working mothers to evangelical Christians.
There is one group no one has recognized, and it is the group that will decide the election: the Angry White Man. The Angry White Man comes from all economic backgrounds, from dirt-poor to filthy rich. He represents all geographic areas in America, from urban sophisticate to rural redneck, deep South to mountain West, left Coast to Eastern Seaboard.
His common traits are that he isn’t looking for anything from anyone — just the promise to be able to make his own way on a level playing field. In many cases, he is an independent businessman and employs several people. He pays more than his share of taxes and works hard.
The victimhood syndrome buzzwords — “disenfranchised,” “marginalized” and “voiceless” — don’t resonate with him. “Press ‘one’ for English” is a curse-word to him. He’s used to picking up the tab, whether it’s the company Christmas party, three sets of braces, three college educations or a beautiful wedding.
He believes the Constitution is to be interpreted literally, not as a “living document” open to the whims and vagaries of a panel of judges who have never worked an honest day in their lives.
The Angry White Man owns firearms, and he’s willing to pick up a gun to defend his home and his country. He is willing to lay down his life to defend the freedom and safety of others, and the thought of killing someone who needs killing really doesn’t bother him.
The Angry White Man is not a metrosexual, a homosexual or a victim. Nobody like him drowned in Hurricane Katrina — he got his people together and got the hell out, then went back in to rescue those too helpless and stupid to help themselves, often as a police officer, a National Guard soldier or a volunteer firefighter.
His last name and religion don’t matter. His background might be Italian, English, Polish, German, Slavic, Irish, or Russian, and he might have Cherokee, Mexican, or Puerto Rican mixed in, but he considers himself a white American.
He’s a man’s man, the kind of guy who likes to play poker, watch football, hunt white-tailed deer, call turkeys, play golf, spend a few bucks at a strip club once in a blue moon, change his own oil and build things. He coaches baseball, soccer and football teams and doesn’t ask for a penny. He’s the kind of guy who can put an addition on his house with a couple of friends, drill an oil well, weld a new bumper for his truck, design a factory and publish books. He can fill a train with 100,000 tons of coal and get it to the power plant on time so that you keep the lights on and never know what it took to flip that light switch.
Women either love him or hate him, but they know he’s a man, not a dishrag. If they’re looking for someone to walk all over, they’ve got the wrong guy. He stands up straight, opens doors for women and says “Yes, sir” and “No, ma’am.”
He might be a Republican and he might be a Democrat; he might be a Libertarian or a Green.
He knows that his wife is more emotional than rational, and he guides the family in a rational manner.
He’s not a racist, but he is annoyed and disappointed when people of certain backgrounds exhibit behavior that typifies the worst stereotypes of their race. He’s willing to give everybody a fair chance if they work hard, play by the rules and learn English.
Most important, the Angry White Man is pissed off. When his job site becomes flooded with illegal workers who don’t pay taxes and his wages drop like a stone, he gets righteously angry. When his job gets shipped overseas, and he has to speak to some incomprehensible idiot in India for tech support, he simmers. When Al Sharpton comes on TV, leading some rally for reparations for slavery or some such nonsense, he bites his tongue and he remembers. When a child gets charged with carrying a concealed weapon for mistakenly bringing a penknife to school, he takes note of who the local idiots are in education and law enforcement.
He also votes, and the Angry White Man loathes Hillary Clinton. Her voice reminds him of a shovel scraping a rock. He recoils at the mere sight of her on television. Her very image disgusts him, and he cannot fathom why anyone would want her as their leader. It’s not that she is a woman. It’s that she is who she is. It’s the liberal victim groups she panders to, the “poor me” attitude that she represents, her inability to give a straight answer to an honest question, his tax dollars that she wants to give to people who refuse to do anything for themselves.
There are many millions of Angry White Men. Four million Angry White Men are members of the National Rifle Association, and all of them will vote against Hillary Clinton, just as the great majority of them voted for George Bush.
He hopes that she will be the Democratic nominee for president in 2008, and he will make sure that she gets beaten like a drum.
Gary Hubbell is a regular columnist with the Aspen Times Weekly.
Just in Case You May Think this Person Would Make a Good President…
Hillary Clinton has been telling America that she is the most qualified candidate for president based on her 'record,' which she says includes her eight years in the White House as First Lady – or 'co-president' - and her seven years in the Senate.
Here is a reminder of what that record includes:
* As First Lady, Hillary assumed authority over Health Care Reform, a process that cost the taxpayers over $13 million. She told both Bill Bradley and Pat Moynahan, key votes needed to pass her legislation, that she would 'demonize' anyone who opposed it. But it was opposed; she couldn't even get it to a vote in a Congress controlled by her own party. (And in the next election, her party lost control of both the House and Senate.)
* Hillary assumed authority over selecting a female Attorney General. Her first two recommendations (Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood) were forced to withdraw their names from consideration, and then she chose Janet Reno. Janet Reno has since been described by Bill himself as 'my worst mistake.'
* Hillary recommended Lani Guanier for head of the Civil Rights Commission. When Guanier's radical views became known, her name had to be withdrawn.
* Hillary recommended her former law partners, Web Hubbell, Vince Foster, and William Kennedy for positions in the Justice Department, White House staff, and the Treasury, respectively. Hubbell was later imprisoned, Foster committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.
* Hillary also recommended a close friend of the Clintons, Craig Livingstone, for the position of director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of up to 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, both Hillary and her husband denied knowing him. (FBI agent Dennis Sculimbrene confirmed in a Senate Judiciary Committee in 1996 both the drug use and Hillary' involvement in hiring Livingstone. After that, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office, after serving seven presidents for over thirty years.)
* In order to open 'slots' in the White House for her friends, the Harry Thomasons (to whom millions of dollars in travel contracts could be awarded), Hillary had the entire staff of the White House Travel Office fired; they were reported to the FBI for 'gross mismanagement' and their reputations ruined. After a thirty-month investigation, only one, Billy Dale, was charged with a crime - mixing personal money with White House funds when he cashed checks. The jury acquitted him in less than two hours.
* Another of Hillary's assumed duties was directing the 'bimbo eruption squad' and scandal defense:
Here is a reminder of what that record includes:
* As First Lady, Hillary assumed authority over Health Care Reform, a process that cost the taxpayers over $13 million. She told both Bill Bradley and Pat Moynahan, key votes needed to pass her legislation, that she would 'demonize' anyone who opposed it. But it was opposed; she couldn't even get it to a vote in a Congress controlled by her own party. (And in the next election, her party lost control of both the House and Senate.)
* Hillary assumed authority over selecting a female Attorney General. Her first two recommendations (Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood) were forced to withdraw their names from consideration, and then she chose Janet Reno. Janet Reno has since been described by Bill himself as 'my worst mistake.'
* Hillary recommended Lani Guanier for head of the Civil Rights Commission. When Guanier's radical views became known, her name had to be withdrawn.
* Hillary recommended her former law partners, Web Hubbell, Vince Foster, and William Kennedy for positions in the Justice Department, White House staff, and the Treasury, respectively. Hubbell was later imprisoned, Foster committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.
* Hillary also recommended a close friend of the Clintons, Craig Livingstone, for the position of director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of up to 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, both Hillary and her husband denied knowing him. (FBI agent Dennis Sculimbrene confirmed in a Senate Judiciary Committee in 1996 both the drug use and Hillary' involvement in hiring Livingstone. After that, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office, after serving seven presidents for over thirty years.)
* In order to open 'slots' in the White House for her friends, the Harry Thomasons (to whom millions of dollars in travel contracts could be awarded), Hillary had the entire staff of the White House Travel Office fired; they were reported to the FBI for 'gross mismanagement' and their reputations ruined. After a thirty-month investigation, only one, Billy Dale, was charged with a crime - mixing personal money with White House funds when he cashed checks. The jury acquitted him in less than two hours.
* Another of Hillary's assumed duties was directing the 'bimbo eruption squad' and scandal defense:
- She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit.
- She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr's investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.
- Then they had to settle with Paula Jones after all.
- And Bill lost his law license for lying to the grand jury
- And Bill was impeached by the House.
- And Hillary almost got herself indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice (she avoided it mostly because she repeated, 'I do not recall,' 'I have no recollection,' and 'I don't know' 56 times under oath).
* Hillary wrote 'It Takes a Village,' demonstrating her Socialist viewpoint.
* Hillary decided to seek election to the Senate in a state she had never lived in. Her husband pardoned FALN terrorists in order to get Latino support and the New Square Hassidim to get Jewish support. Hillary also had Bill pardon her brother's clients, for a small fee, to get financial support.
* Then Hillary left the White House, but later had to return $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork she had stolen.
* In the campaign for the Senate, Hillary played the 'woman card' by portraying her opponent (Lazio) as a bully picking on her.
* Hillary's husband further protected her by asking the National Archives to withhold from the public until 2012 many records of their time in the White House, including much of Hillary's correspondence and her calendars. (There are ongoing lawsuits to force the release of those records.)
* As the junior Senator from New York, Hillary has passed no major legislation. She has deferred to the senior Senator (Schumer) to tend to the needs of New Yorkers, even on the hot issue of medical problems of workers involved in the cleanup of Ground Zero after 9/11
* Hillary's one notable vote, supporting the plan to invade Iraq, she has since disavowed.
Quite a resume, isn't it? Sounds more like an organized crime family...
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Drunks, Drug Addicts, Victims
Reference The Mountain Press editorial, Monday, February 11, 2008, “Is performing a award?”
I agree with your point BUT Ms Winehouse, (I am old enough to have no idea who she is) was not rewarded as much as the program was rewarded and was able to avoid negative press. Can you imagine the outcry if she was not permitted to perform? The producers of the reward show would have been attacked throughout the media for judging and punishing poor Ms Winehouse. She would be on CNN for the next week as a victim of the do-gooders. One other thing, I believe because she has a problem she should be punished. She made the problem and she is the only one who can correct it. Ignoring it does not help. She is a 24-year-old drunk and drug addict. She is the scourge of society. She should be ostracized until she eliminates the problem. At that point we can let her return to proper society.
Associating album and DVD sales with talent is problematic. Talent has little to do with sales and they can be and are most of the time, mutually exclusive. Does she wear skimpy enough clothes as to get the hormones of both young and old excited? Does she rebel against the establishment by using drugs and alcohol AND sex to get a lot of media attention? Talent is the least of the parts of the equation.
Your comment “our culture is taking another situation and glorifying it for society” is right on. As no one besides me of course believes Ms Winehouse should be punished, we let her be a victim. Remember that local drunk and drug addict Renfro(?). How about Ledger (?)Drunks and drug addicts. Victims......
Mosaics: ...the oldest members of the youngest generation, currently 18 or 19 years old
Busters: ....those 20 to 38 years of age
Baby Boomers: ....ages 39 through 57 and
Elders: ....a combination of the two oldest generations, comprised of people 58 or older
Views On "Morally Acceptable" Behaviors,
by Generation
The data trends indicate that the moral perspectives of Americans are likely to continue to deteriorate. Compared to surveys conducted two years ago, significantly more adults are depicting such behaviors as morally acceptable. For instance, there have been increases in the percentages that condone sexual activity with someone of the opposite gender other than a spouse, abortion (up by 25%), and a 20% jump in people’s acceptance of ‘gay sex.’
Men were more likely than women to deem nine of the ten behaviors to be morally acceptable. (The exception was sexual relations between people of the same gender, which women were slightly more likely to condone.) The most sizeable gaps were related to pornography (men were twice as likely to deem pornography acceptable) and drunkenness.
Among people aligned with faiths other than Christianity, half or more described each of seven behaviors as "morally acceptable" - gambling, co-habitation, sexual fantasies, having an abortion, having a sexual relationship with someone of the opposite sex other than their spouse, pornography and profanity. Atheists and agnostics were the people most likely to describe any of these behaviors as morally acceptable. In total, atheists and agnostics defined nine of the ten behaviors as morally legitimate, dismissing only the use of non-prescription drugs.
I agree with your point BUT Ms Winehouse, (I am old enough to have no idea who she is) was not rewarded as much as the program was rewarded and was able to avoid negative press. Can you imagine the outcry if she was not permitted to perform? The producers of the reward show would have been attacked throughout the media for judging and punishing poor Ms Winehouse. She would be on CNN for the next week as a victim of the do-gooders. One other thing, I believe because she has a problem she should be punished. She made the problem and she is the only one who can correct it. Ignoring it does not help. She is a 24-year-old drunk and drug addict. She is the scourge of society. She should be ostracized until she eliminates the problem. At that point we can let her return to proper society.
Associating album and DVD sales with talent is problematic. Talent has little to do with sales and they can be and are most of the time, mutually exclusive. Does she wear skimpy enough clothes as to get the hormones of both young and old excited? Does she rebel against the establishment by using drugs and alcohol AND sex to get a lot of media attention? Talent is the least of the parts of the equation.
Your comment “our culture is taking another situation and glorifying it for society” is right on. As no one besides me of course believes Ms Winehouse should be punished, we let her be a victim. Remember that local drunk and drug addict Renfro(?). How about Ledger (?)Drunks and drug addicts. Victims......
Mosaics: ...the oldest members of the youngest generation, currently 18 or 19 years old
Busters: ....those 20 to 38 years of age
Baby Boomers: ....ages 39 through 57 and
Elders: ....a combination of the two oldest generations, comprised of people 58 or older
Views On "Morally Acceptable" Behaviors,
by Generation
The data trends indicate that the moral perspectives of Americans are likely to continue to deteriorate. Compared to surveys conducted two years ago, significantly more adults are depicting such behaviors as morally acceptable. For instance, there have been increases in the percentages that condone sexual activity with someone of the opposite gender other than a spouse, abortion (up by 25%), and a 20% jump in people’s acceptance of ‘gay sex.’
Men were more likely than women to deem nine of the ten behaviors to be morally acceptable. (The exception was sexual relations between people of the same gender, which women were slightly more likely to condone.) The most sizeable gaps were related to pornography (men were twice as likely to deem pornography acceptable) and drunkenness.
Among people aligned with faiths other than Christianity, half or more described each of seven behaviors as "morally acceptable" - gambling, co-habitation, sexual fantasies, having an abortion, having a sexual relationship with someone of the opposite sex other than their spouse, pornography and profanity. Atheists and agnostics were the people most likely to describe any of these behaviors as morally acceptable. In total, atheists and agnostics defined nine of the ten behaviors as morally legitimate, dismissing only the use of non-prescription drugs.
Political Correctness is Destroying US
Spanish writer Sebastian Vilar RoIdrigez and published in a Spanish newspaper on 5-22-07
ALL EUROPEAN LIFE DIED IN AUSCHWITZ By Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez(*)
I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly discovered a terrible truth - Europe died in Auschwitz . We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world.
The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world. These are the people we burned.
And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty, due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride.
They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful Spanish cities into the third world, drowning in filth and crime
Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts.
And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition
We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their talent for hoping for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs.
What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.
A lot of Americans have become so insulated from reality that they imagine America can suffer defeat without any inconvenience to themselves. Absolutely No Profiling! Pause a moment, reflect back,
These events are actual events from history. They really happened! Do you remember?
1. 1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by A Muslim male extremist between the ages of 17 and 40
2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
3. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
4. During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
5. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
6. In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
7. In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
8. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
9. In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
10. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
11. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands of people were killed by: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
12. In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
13. In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by: Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
No, I really don't see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you? So, to ensure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be allowed to profile certain people. They must conduct random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, secret agents who are members of the President's security detail, 85-year old Congressmen with metal hips, and Medal of Honor winner and former Governor Joe Foss, but leave Muslim Males between the ages 17 and 40 alone lest they be guilty of profiling. Let's send this to as many people as we can so that the Gloria Aldreds and other under-headed attorneys along with Federal Justices that want to thwart common sense, feel ash amed of themselves -- if they have any such sense.
As the writer of the award winning story "Forrest Gump" so aptly put it, "Stupid is as stupid does."
Wednesday, February 06, 2008
Gatlinburg, London, Sister Cities
Prince Charles , warned that historic sites like the Tower of London have been “vandalized” by high-rise construction that threatens to ruin the character of the capital.
The heir to the British throne, who spoke at a conference on city planning, argued that poor planning could damage the integrity of Britain ’s historical areas, particularly criticizing tall buildings that dwarf smaller structures.
“We seem to be determined to vandalize these few remaining sites which retain the kind of human scale and timeless character that so attract people to them and which increase in value as time goes by,” Charles said at St. James’ Palace.
Change “ Tower of London ” to Mountain View Hotel” or “Greystone Hotel” or “Gatlinburg Inn” and change “ Britain ” to “Gatlinburg”, and “high-rise construction and tall buildings”, to “cabins, cabins, cabins,” and change “St James Palace” to “ Gatlinburg City Hall ” and it kind of hits home, don’t you think?
It appears Gatlinburg is suffering from an international problem.
The heir to the British throne, who spoke at a conference on city planning, argued that poor planning could damage the integrity of Britain ’s historical areas, particularly criticizing tall buildings that dwarf smaller structures.
“We seem to be determined to vandalize these few remaining sites which retain the kind of human scale and timeless character that so attract people to them and which increase in value as time goes by,” Charles said at St. James’ Palace.
Change “ Tower of London ” to Mountain View Hotel” or “Greystone Hotel” or “Gatlinburg Inn” and change “ Britain ” to “Gatlinburg”, and “high-rise construction and tall buildings”, to “cabins, cabins, cabins,” and change “St James Palace” to “ Gatlinburg City Hall ” and it kind of hits home, don’t you think?
It appears Gatlinburg is suffering from an international problem.
Wednesday, January 09, 2008
Tennessee Motorcycle Law Not Government's Responsibility
In the next few months the Tennessee Assembly and Governon will be deciding whether or not to repeal Tennessee's motorcycle law. It is not government’s responsibility to stop citizens from acting stupidly, just those acts that affect others. In situations covered by Tennessee's Motorcycle Law, insurance companies have absolute control. All they have to do is to insert “riders” in their policies. How about these:
- Driving or riding a motorcycle, without a helmet, voids medical and/or life insurance coverage.
- DUI or riding with a driver determined by the police to have been DUI voids medical and/or life insurance coverage for driver and passengers.
- Driving or riding without using a seat-belt voids medical and/or life insurance coverage.
- If an illness is determined to have been caused by smoking, medical and/or life insurance coverage is voided.
See how easy it could be. The problem is insurance companies are profiting by passing their costs along to the rest of us as they continue to enable the violaters. Insurance companies should be prohibited from passing along costs they incur covering illegal activities and activities determined by the medical community to be hazardous to the health of the offending individual as well as the health of others.
As is common we all are paying for the stupidity of others and/or for their illegal activities. How about we stop that?
Thursday, January 03, 2008
Wal-Mart Subsidized by State and Federal Governments, Us.
The only people making money are the Waltons. Wal-Mart keeps the pressure on their vendors to keep their prices low. The vendors keep their prices low by paying their employees at or below poverty level. Wal-Mart keeps their prices low by paying their employees at or below the poverty level. The majority of these employees do not participate in the company-offered-benefits because they cannot affort their share. Therefore Tenncare and Medicare provide the company-offered-benefits. Wal-Mart as a whole reports 46% of their employees have benefits. The rest, at least those in Tennessee rely on Tenncare or Medicare etc. In other words we subsidize the Waltons.
Financial magazines have stories from China how Wal-Mart demands low prices so they can sell to the public at low prices. To meet that requirement, Wal-Mart suppliers do not pay their employees very well. Wal-Mart does not pay their employees very well so the only people making money are the Waltons and as you see some of their executives who bring home $400,000 a week. Wal-Mart watch is an organization monitoring Wal-Mart and its business practices.
Wal-Mart has turned into a monster Sam Walton never conceived of and the story below is an example.
Wal-Mart Watch will launch an on-line fundraiser today to assist former Wal-Mart employee Deborah Shank and her family of Jackson, Missouri with Mrs. Shank’s medical expenses after Wal-Mart demanded repayment for its health care plan costs from the family. The organization also pledged to match all funds raised.
A November 20 Wall Street Journal article entitled “Accident Victims Face Grab for Legal Winnings,” reported on Mrs. Shank’s story. When she was left brain damaged after a tragic collision with a semi-trailer truck seven years ago, her Wal-Mart health care plan paid her initial medical bills. Wal-Mart subsequently sued the Shanks for the $470,000 it paid in medical expenses, plus the company’s legal expenses and attorney’s fees. Wal-Mart’s lawsuit demands will completely drain the settlement money set aside in a trust for Mrs. Shank’s future care and force her to rely on public assistance for her medical and living expenses.
As Wal-Mart touts its new health care plan and launches public relations campaigns to repair its damaged reputation, this story once again exposes the company’s poor business practices and total disregard for the health and welfare of its employees.
“Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott’s decision to take away the money that Mrs. Shank would use for her medical expenses represents the kind of failure of moral leadership that we have sadly come to expect from him,” said David Nassar, Wal-Mart Watch Executive Director. “The Shanks are a hard-working American family - the kind that Lee Scott currently claims Wal-Mart helps to ‘save money and live better.’ Unfortunately, the Shank family is doing neither.”
Wal-Mart Watch will raise funds for the Shank family and tell their story to remind consumers this holiday season that the low costs Wal-Mart provide come with a very high price paid by American families like the Shanks every day.
“Lee Scott will bring home more than $400,000 this week alone,” Nassar added. “If Wal-Mart needs that money so badly, perhaps Scott should pay it himself. Or, maybe the Walton family, some of the wealthiest individuals in the nation, would be willing to pay it to attempt to quell the moral outrage this story is generating against their father’s company. But, we will not wait for Lee Scott or the Walton family to do the right thing. We are doing something about it ourselves and we hope to make a difference for Mrs. Shank and her family.”
Financial magazines have stories from China how Wal-Mart demands low prices so they can sell to the public at low prices. To meet that requirement, Wal-Mart suppliers do not pay their employees very well. Wal-Mart does not pay their employees very well so the only people making money are the Waltons and as you see some of their executives who bring home $400,000 a week. Wal-Mart watch is an organization monitoring Wal-Mart and its business practices.
Wal-Mart has turned into a monster Sam Walton never conceived of and the story below is an example.
Wal-Mart Watch will launch an on-line fundraiser today to assist former Wal-Mart employee Deborah Shank and her family of Jackson, Missouri with Mrs. Shank’s medical expenses after Wal-Mart demanded repayment for its health care plan costs from the family. The organization also pledged to match all funds raised.
A November 20 Wall Street Journal article entitled “Accident Victims Face Grab for Legal Winnings,” reported on Mrs. Shank’s story. When she was left brain damaged after a tragic collision with a semi-trailer truck seven years ago, her Wal-Mart health care plan paid her initial medical bills. Wal-Mart subsequently sued the Shanks for the $470,000 it paid in medical expenses, plus the company’s legal expenses and attorney’s fees. Wal-Mart’s lawsuit demands will completely drain the settlement money set aside in a trust for Mrs. Shank’s future care and force her to rely on public assistance for her medical and living expenses.
As Wal-Mart touts its new health care plan and launches public relations campaigns to repair its damaged reputation, this story once again exposes the company’s poor business practices and total disregard for the health and welfare of its employees.
“Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott’s decision to take away the money that Mrs. Shank would use for her medical expenses represents the kind of failure of moral leadership that we have sadly come to expect from him,” said David Nassar, Wal-Mart Watch Executive Director. “The Shanks are a hard-working American family - the kind that Lee Scott currently claims Wal-Mart helps to ‘save money and live better.’ Unfortunately, the Shank family is doing neither.”
Wal-Mart Watch will raise funds for the Shank family and tell their story to remind consumers this holiday season that the low costs Wal-Mart provide come with a very high price paid by American families like the Shanks every day.
“Lee Scott will bring home more than $400,000 this week alone,” Nassar added. “If Wal-Mart needs that money so badly, perhaps Scott should pay it himself. Or, maybe the Walton family, some of the wealthiest individuals in the nation, would be willing to pay it to attempt to quell the moral outrage this story is generating against their father’s company. But, we will not wait for Lee Scott or the Walton family to do the right thing. We are doing something about it ourselves and we hope to make a difference for Mrs. Shank and her family.”
Buying More and More for Less and Less
The expanding global economy demands that corporations seek out the cheapest possible labor to maximize profit, and stimulate growth and innovation. With free trade has come an explosion of global inequality making it possible for consumers to buy more and more while paying less and less.
Some in the business world insist that the business sector's efforts to tap into the vast pool of cheap labor in poorer countries are all about free market economics.
Unfortunately, this remains largely ignored by the American consumer.
Chain retailers that sell low-cost goods manufactured overseas by workers who are allegedly paid less than the minimum wage, forced to work long hours, not given overtime pay and even beaten in order to keep them working grueling shifts have become easy targets for human rights groups. Companies that once urged consumers to "Buy American" are among the largest importers of goods made in China, which is one of the world's worst labor abusers.
We have perfected the art of indulgence and avoidance. Wealthy as we are in the West, living and eating off the fruits of their labor, can honestly say we are unaware or that the problem is simply too great to comprehend. In other words, do not to think about it."
We have perfected the art of indulgence and avoidance. Wealthy as we are in the West, living and eating off the fruits of their labor, can honestly say we are unaware or that the problem is simply too great to comprehend. In other words, do not to think about it."
We must think about it. And in thinking about it, at some point we must realize that there is a moral dimension to our buying habits. As long as we are willing to buy, buy, buy at lower and lower prices without a care for how those goods were produced or where they came from, corporations will continue to seek out cheap labor, which invariably goes hand in hand with inhumane working conditions.
We should take a moral stand against sweatshop labor. Christ urged his followers to reach out to the less fortunate. Christians claiming to emulate Christ should speak out against slave labor. If Christians would boycott large chains that perpetuate inhumane labor practices and working conditions, it could go a long way toward changing conditions around the world.
The next time you head out the door in search of another great deal, remember that your bargain could be coming at someone else's expense. For example, a report on a Korean-owned factory described working conditions:
Toilets and canteens were unsanitary. Some managers screamed at workers or pressured those who complained to resign. And many women, who comprise 88% of the plant's workers, said they were denied time off for doctors' appointments. One pregnant worker who had a note from her doctor about a high-risk pregnancy was not allowed to leave until five hours after she complained of pain. She lost the baby.
.
Nothing Good Happens in a Bar Late
Nothing good happens in a bar after 11:00pm . People with jobs are either home preparing for the next day's job or at their job. Either way they are not in a bar. Most of the people in bars after 11:00pm are there because they have no better place to be and that is sad.
Recently a visitor from out-of-state was shot by another bar patron who was eventually killed by local police. What happened to the visitor was terrible but nothing good happens in a bar after 11:00pm especially for the father of eight children. His careless and selfish decision has forced his children to grow up without their dad. His death was not his fault but his decision to be there, that late, was.
Recently a visitor from out-of-state was shot by another bar patron who was eventually killed by local police. What happened to the visitor was terrible but nothing good happens in a bar after 11:00pm especially for the father of eight children. His careless and selfish decision has forced his children to grow up without their dad. His death was not his fault but his decision to be there, that late, was.
Wal-Mart Clips
In 2006, a Pennsylvania State University study revealed that during the last decade, dependence on the food stamp program nationwide increased by 8 percent, while in counties with Wal-Mart stores the increase was almost twice as large at 15.3 percent. Although Wal-Mart employs many people living in its communities, for most, the hours worked and the wages paid do not help these families transition out of poverty, the study said. [St. Louis Business Journal, 5/17/06]
In October 2003, a 21-state immigration raid at Wal-Mart stores happened because the government believed that Wal-Mart executives knew their cleaning contractors were using illegal immigrants, officials said. In 1998 and 2001, 102 illegal immigrants working for Wal-Mart contractors had been arrested and 13 Wal-Mart cleaning contractors had pleaded guilty after those arrests. [New York Times, 10/25/03]
Friday, December 21, 2007
Booting/NonConsensual Towing = Auto Theft
States have different laws and the way things are done in one state are not necessarily done the same way in another state. In many states before a vehicle is towed, signs with specific state designated language must be posted. Without the special language, towing is stealing. The state legislatures have to be careful that stealing cars does not become legal because of the wording in the law or ordinance governing booting and towing.
Making a giant jump to a conclusion I suspect local businesses have not followed the rule. Not following the law to the letter is stealing. It will not be long before the wrong person is "booted" resulting in non-consensual towing. That individual just might have a gun and someone is going to be hurt maybe killed. Can you imagine the outcry of sympathy for the person towing or booting? I cannot. Or, the individual will go to court and put Sevier county on the map. We all know hick towns known as speed traps. Sevier County just might become known as the hick county that legalizes stealing automobiles and holding them for ransom. Legalizing extortion as another source of income.
METROPOLITAN NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION LICENSING COMMISSION
Minutes of
September 25, 2007
PUBLIC HEARING: NEW WRECKER RULE – NONCONSENT TOWING FROM PRIVATE
PROPERTY
Rule 24. NONCONSENT TOWING FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY
Prior to towing a vehicle (or personal property) from private property without the vehicle (or personal property) owner’s consent, the towing company must have express written authorization for towing of that vehicle (or personal property) from the owner of the private property or designated agent. When an individual is designated by a private property owner to act as an agent to authorize towing from the property, such designation must be in writing and signed. There shall be some relationship between the private property owner and the designated agent, and there may be no relationship between the designated agent and the towing company. Contracts or written agreements between a towing company and private property owners for nonconsent towing must be retained by the towing company, and must include the property owner’s signature and the signature(s) of any agent(s) designated by the private property owner. The towing company must make these documents available for inspection by the commission or any designated representative at any time. Maximum allowable rates for nonconsent towing from private property will be as specified in Section 6.80.550(H) of the Metropolitan Code of Laws.
Making a giant jump to a conclusion I suspect local businesses have not followed the rule. Not following the law to the letter is stealing. It will not be long before the wrong person is "booted" resulting in non-consensual towing. That individual just might have a gun and someone is going to be hurt maybe killed. Can you imagine the outcry of sympathy for the person towing or booting? I cannot. Or, the individual will go to court and put Sevier county on the map. We all know hick towns known as speed traps. Sevier County just might become known as the hick county that legalizes stealing automobiles and holding them for ransom. Legalizing extortion as another source of income.
METROPOLITAN NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION LICENSING COMMISSION
Minutes of
September 25, 2007
PUBLIC HEARING: NEW WRECKER RULE – NONCONSENT TOWING FROM PRIVATE
PROPERTY
Rule 24. NONCONSENT TOWING FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY
Prior to towing a vehicle (or personal property) from private property without the vehicle (or personal property) owner’s consent, the towing company must have express written authorization for towing of that vehicle (or personal property) from the owner of the private property or designated agent. When an individual is designated by a private property owner to act as an agent to authorize towing from the property, such designation must be in writing and signed. There shall be some relationship between the private property owner and the designated agent, and there may be no relationship between the designated agent and the towing company. Contracts or written agreements between a towing company and private property owners for nonconsent towing must be retained by the towing company, and must include the property owner’s signature and the signature(s) of any agent(s) designated by the private property owner. The towing company must make these documents available for inspection by the commission or any designated representative at any time. Maximum allowable rates for nonconsent towing from private property will be as specified in Section 6.80.550(H) of the Metropolitan Code of Laws.
Friday, December 14, 2007
Whiney Professional Athletes, Disgusting
Referencing the death of Sean Taylor, formerly of the Washington Redskins and the concerns of professional athletes for their personal safety, nothing good happens in a bar after 11:00pm. People with jobs are either working or home sleeping to prepare for the next day’s work or should I say obligations.
Today, professional athletes do not miss an opportunity to gloat and to show off their money and the things money can buy. It was reported there were three cars in Taylor’s entourage including a Rolls Royce. The Rolls cost more than the ten houses in the old neighborhood and does not blend in the old neighborhood. Rolls are intended to draw attention to the wealth of the owner and do it very well.
When was the last time you heard of Bill Gates or Warren Buffet being involved in a shooting at a bar or strip joint at 2:00 in the morning. Do they have entourages? Do they drive Rolls?
Taylor rubbed his money in the faces of the wrong people. He did not deserve to die but he put himself into the situation and he paid the price. ESPN reported that he was facing up to 46 years in prison resulting from charges he threatened three people with a gun. Obviously he was a very nice person.
Professional athletes should play their sport and keep their mouths shut and have a very high fence installed surrounding their property; to protect them from their friends and to protect the rest of us from them.
Today, professional athletes do not miss an opportunity to gloat and to show off their money and the things money can buy. It was reported there were three cars in Taylor’s entourage including a Rolls Royce. The Rolls cost more than the ten houses in the old neighborhood and does not blend in the old neighborhood. Rolls are intended to draw attention to the wealth of the owner and do it very well.
When was the last time you heard of Bill Gates or Warren Buffet being involved in a shooting at a bar or strip joint at 2:00 in the morning. Do they have entourages? Do they drive Rolls?
Taylor rubbed his money in the faces of the wrong people. He did not deserve to die but he put himself into the situation and he paid the price. ESPN reported that he was facing up to 46 years in prison resulting from charges he threatened three people with a gun. Obviously he was a very nice person.
Professional athletes should play their sport and keep their mouths shut and have a very high fence installed surrounding their property; to protect them from their friends and to protect the rest of us from them.
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Co-evolution vs Reality
There is a concept of animals and plants responding to one another that biologists call co-evolution. The giant hawk moth and how it developed a proboscis long enough to reach the nectar of the Madagascar Star Orchid is an example.
As one who believes in Intelligent Design, Evolution and its adherents intrigue me.
On the subject an individual may select from two alternatives.
1. Things just happened.
2. Things were created.
Both alternatives rely on faith but only one is accepted as fact by folks such as Smithsonian. Since Evolution is referred to as a theory even scientists do not take it as fact but as a theory.
Alternative 1: Over an unknown period, an unknown number of events spontaneously occurred resulting in nothing becoming matter. Then, over another unknown period, that matter evolved into some material that evolved into the universe and all forms of life. The reason and cause of the spontaneous actions are not addressed.
Alternative 2: Someone created matter from nothing. Then the matter was molded into the universe and all forms of life. Cause and why are addressed in the only literature that claims to know, The Bible.
If the first alternative is correct then we are all accidents with accidental thoughts and emotions and your column as well as the magazine are the result of accidental thinking.
In efforts to prove the universe just happened various theories have been developed. Any theory that does not address the beginning of matter misses the point of the theory, to explain creation of the universe.
Those who disbelieve in the existence of a Higher Intelligence (God) and consider the Bible to be not relevant also have faith. The Big Bang Theory depends on a single point of infinitely dense and infinitely hot matter but does not address its origin. From where did the matter come? Did nothing become this matter, how? How was it hot? The Theory makes major assumptions.
Now to the giant hawk moth, has anyone concluded how the cells of the body of a specific moth determined the proboscis was the problem and it was not the legs or the wings? How about how long did it take for one such moth to “evolve” but it died before another moth with the same characteristics came on the scene but of the same gender? How did the body of the moth conclude it not only needed a modification to the proboscis but it had to be of the other gender? It occurs to me evolution requires more coincidences than a reasonable person could accept. I do not know how long the giant hawk moth lives but I imagine it is a relatively short time requiring the two I mentioned before to appear within that short window.
The use of 50 million years for this and 100 million years for that reminds me of a park ranger, I believe at Estes Park in Colorado. At a presentation he explained how something happened 2,000,008 years ago. He explained how he could be so specific is that 8 years earlier when he arrived at Estes Park he was told the something happened 2 million years ago.
Nice concept but I wonder about its validity if the author was just an accident of nature or “evolved” from a monkey.
As one who believes in Intelligent Design, Evolution and its adherents intrigue me.
On the subject an individual may select from two alternatives.
1. Things just happened.
2. Things were created.
Both alternatives rely on faith but only one is accepted as fact by folks such as Smithsonian. Since Evolution is referred to as a theory even scientists do not take it as fact but as a theory.
Alternative 1: Over an unknown period, an unknown number of events spontaneously occurred resulting in nothing becoming matter. Then, over another unknown period, that matter evolved into some material that evolved into the universe and all forms of life. The reason and cause of the spontaneous actions are not addressed.
Alternative 2: Someone created matter from nothing. Then the matter was molded into the universe and all forms of life. Cause and why are addressed in the only literature that claims to know, The Bible.
If the first alternative is correct then we are all accidents with accidental thoughts and emotions and your column as well as the magazine are the result of accidental thinking.
In efforts to prove the universe just happened various theories have been developed. Any theory that does not address the beginning of matter misses the point of the theory, to explain creation of the universe.
Those who disbelieve in the existence of a Higher Intelligence (God) and consider the Bible to be not relevant also have faith. The Big Bang Theory depends on a single point of infinitely dense and infinitely hot matter but does not address its origin. From where did the matter come? Did nothing become this matter, how? How was it hot? The Theory makes major assumptions.
Now to the giant hawk moth, has anyone concluded how the cells of the body of a specific moth determined the proboscis was the problem and it was not the legs or the wings? How about how long did it take for one such moth to “evolve” but it died before another moth with the same characteristics came on the scene but of the same gender? How did the body of the moth conclude it not only needed a modification to the proboscis but it had to be of the other gender? It occurs to me evolution requires more coincidences than a reasonable person could accept. I do not know how long the giant hawk moth lives but I imagine it is a relatively short time requiring the two I mentioned before to appear within that short window.
The use of 50 million years for this and 100 million years for that reminds me of a park ranger, I believe at Estes Park in Colorado. At a presentation he explained how something happened 2,000,008 years ago. He explained how he could be so specific is that 8 years earlier when he arrived at Estes Park he was told the something happened 2 million years ago.
Nice concept but I wonder about its validity if the author was just an accident of nature or “evolved” from a monkey.
Monday, October 29, 2007
Humane Executions
In recent months there have been challenges to lethal injection as a manner of execution. Most challenges have come from convicted criminals sentenced to such executions. The challenges ignore the fact the Constitution does not prohibit uncomfortable punishments nor does it require pain free punishments. The Eighth Amendment reads, Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
To understand where those who wrote and ratified the Constitution and its amendments were coming from we must understand common punishment of their time.
Common punishments at the time were stocks, branding, hanging, and "hang draw and quarter." Nonviolent crimes may have resulted in the convicted criminal being locked head and hands or feet in stocks for public humiliation and a little mistreatment by the public. Those convicted of capital crimes were usually either branded or hanged by the neck until they were dead. A second conviction for a capital crime of a branded person resulted in hanging, no questions asked. For especially heinous crimes or crimes such as treason the punishment was the hang draw and quarter. In this punishment, you were hanged until very nearly dead; then you were disemboweled and your private parts cut off, all while you were still conscious. A good executioner could do it very quickly, so that you did not die too early. The person being executed would then be pulled apart with four horses tied to his extremities, so as to execute him.
Now, compare that with lethal injection and the uncomfortable “prick” of a needle.
If we make "humane" the guiding principle for executions and require that executions be performed humanely I have a suggestion.
The Humane Slaughter Act of 1958 requires livestock, prior to being killed, be rendered insensible to pain, stunned into unconsciousness by a single blow or gunshot or an electrical, chemical or other means that is rapid and effective. Congress found that the use of humane methods prevents needless suffering. Thus we have the congressional approval of the use of the "captive bolt gun" to stun the animal into unconsciousness.
The captive bolt gun could be used to stun the convicted subject being executed making them insensible to pain or unconscious. The bolt is a heavy rod made of non-rusting alloys, such as stainless steel (there is no danger of the subject catching any cruel or unusual illnesses or rashes etc). The bolt is propelled forward by the discharge of a blank round, which is ignited by a firing pin (actuated by a trigger pull).
Being struck in the forehead and rendered insensible to pain the subject can then be safely and painlessly executed in any manner defined by the law. This will ensure a humane AND Constitutional execution.
If you do not believe this to be humane you might want to give up eating beef, pork, and lamb because in all probability this is how they get to your table.
To understand where those who wrote and ratified the Constitution and its amendments were coming from we must understand common punishment of their time.
Common punishments at the time were stocks, branding, hanging, and "hang draw and quarter." Nonviolent crimes may have resulted in the convicted criminal being locked head and hands or feet in stocks for public humiliation and a little mistreatment by the public. Those convicted of capital crimes were usually either branded or hanged by the neck until they were dead. A second conviction for a capital crime of a branded person resulted in hanging, no questions asked. For especially heinous crimes or crimes such as treason the punishment was the hang draw and quarter. In this punishment, you were hanged until very nearly dead; then you were disemboweled and your private parts cut off, all while you were still conscious. A good executioner could do it very quickly, so that you did not die too early. The person being executed would then be pulled apart with four horses tied to his extremities, so as to execute him.
Now, compare that with lethal injection and the uncomfortable “prick” of a needle.
If we make "humane" the guiding principle for executions and require that executions be performed humanely I have a suggestion.
The Humane Slaughter Act of 1958 requires livestock, prior to being killed, be rendered insensible to pain, stunned into unconsciousness by a single blow or gunshot or an electrical, chemical or other means that is rapid and effective. Congress found that the use of humane methods prevents needless suffering. Thus we have the congressional approval of the use of the "captive bolt gun" to stun the animal into unconsciousness.
The captive bolt gun could be used to stun the convicted subject being executed making them insensible to pain or unconscious. The bolt is a heavy rod made of non-rusting alloys, such as stainless steel (there is no danger of the subject catching any cruel or unusual illnesses or rashes etc). The bolt is propelled forward by the discharge of a blank round, which is ignited by a firing pin (actuated by a trigger pull).
Being struck in the forehead and rendered insensible to pain the subject can then be safely and painlessly executed in any manner defined by the law. This will ensure a humane AND Constitutional execution.
If you do not believe this to be humane you might want to give up eating beef, pork, and lamb because in all probability this is how they get to your table.
Thursday, October 18, 2007
China Preparing
I have read and am re-reading a book titled China Wars that describes how China is getting cozy with various countries in South America. Middle East and on the African Continent and we cannot respond because China owns so much of our national debt. If they were to call the loans it would destroy the financial markets of the United States. Many if not all of the weapons used against the United States in Somalia during the Clinton administration were from China. The Chinese keep us on edge by threatening to make Taiwan part of China again which would require the United States to become militarily involved due to our long standing promise to defend Taiwan against such a move. They are also inhabiting a series of islands leading up to China and will eventually be able to control ships going to Japan and other neighboring countries in times of disagreement.
It also explains how the Chinese copy and pirate just about everything made by companies who outsource their production to China. It is possible but takes a lot of work to survive in the United States without buying something made in China. It is nice to know Wal-Mart has the courage to confront the Chinese which is something the United States as a country cannot do anymore.
Maybe we should take a lesson from Wal-Mart's manual on employee relations with our migrant workers.
Below is a note found in the Washington Post....
At a factory in Shenzhen, China poor migrant workers assemble stereos supplied to Wal-Mart stores. Factory engineer Surely Huang says "the profit is really small...we have to constantly cut costs to satisfy Wal-Mart". Workers receive about $120 a month. A sign on the wall reminds them of their expendability in a nation with hundreds of millions of surplus workers: "If you don't work hard today, tomorrow you'll have to try hard to look for a job."
I wonder which Dale Carnegie class the Chinese missed....or misunderstood when they pirated the lesson material....
It also explains how the Chinese copy and pirate just about everything made by companies who outsource their production to China. It is possible but takes a lot of work to survive in the United States without buying something made in China. It is nice to know Wal-Mart has the courage to confront the Chinese which is something the United States as a country cannot do anymore.
Maybe we should take a lesson from Wal-Mart's manual on employee relations with our migrant workers.
Below is a note found in the Washington Post....
At a factory in Shenzhen, China poor migrant workers assemble stereos supplied to Wal-Mart stores. Factory engineer Surely Huang says "the profit is really small...we have to constantly cut costs to satisfy Wal-Mart". Workers receive about $120 a month. A sign on the wall reminds them of their expendability in a nation with hundreds of millions of surplus workers: "If you don't work hard today, tomorrow you'll have to try hard to look for a job."
I wonder which Dale Carnegie class the Chinese missed....or misunderstood when they pirated the lesson material....
Higher Calling
Email to Gatlinburg City Commissioners and City Manager.....
City Commissioners and City Manager:
Today's (Tuesday October 16th) The Mountain Press has a front page article about a little boy preaching on the Parkway in Gatlinburg. If Gatlinburg does not already have one you might want to consider ordinances controlling such activities and limiting the using of microphones or any amplification systems.You might consider a Free Speech zone out of the way so as to not annoy the tourists and citizens.
We live in a multicultural society and what was at one time considered a Christian country is far from it today. Gatlinburg has enough folks from India and it is only a matter of time before they will want to preach their Hindu beliefs or there will be or are Muslims in Gatlinburg who will want to preach their beliefs. The groups could go on including White Supremacists or Black Power advocates, or Native American causes and on and on.
Cute only goes so far.....
City Commissioners and City Manager:
Today's (Tuesday October 16th) The Mountain Press has a front page article about a little boy preaching on the Parkway in Gatlinburg. If Gatlinburg does not already have one you might want to consider ordinances controlling such activities and limiting the using of microphones or any amplification systems.You might consider a Free Speech zone out of the way so as to not annoy the tourists and citizens.
We live in a multicultural society and what was at one time considered a Christian country is far from it today. Gatlinburg has enough folks from India and it is only a matter of time before they will want to preach their Hindu beliefs or there will be or are Muslims in Gatlinburg who will want to preach their beliefs. The groups could go on including White Supremacists or Black Power advocates, or Native American causes and on and on.
Cute only goes so far.....
Tuesday, October 02, 2007
Corporate America's Fantasy World
Corporate America management live in a fantasy land. They lie and mislead Wall Street analysts to benefit their stock. I mean their stock as in their shares and their bank account.
They claim to believe every month will be better than the current month. Constant growth is not realistic. People who claim such cannot be trusted.
Every company will cease to grow someday and when they stop they will have to be managed differently than when they were a growing and expanding company.
Sam Walton had an idea that has long since been copied by competitors. It is time for another idea.
Corporations cannot pay people so they live at or near poverty level and expect loyalty. You can not put unqualified people into management positions just because they of their gender or their race just to placate the public. If you doubt that look at Wal-Mart.
Wal-Mart is passed its prime and new managment strategies and expectations must be developed.
They claim to believe every month will be better than the current month. Constant growth is not realistic. People who claim such cannot be trusted.
Every company will cease to grow someday and when they stop they will have to be managed differently than when they were a growing and expanding company.
Sam Walton had an idea that has long since been copied by competitors. It is time for another idea.
Corporations cannot pay people so they live at or near poverty level and expect loyalty. You can not put unqualified people into management positions just because they of their gender or their race just to placate the public. If you doubt that look at Wal-Mart.
Wal-Mart is passed its prime and new managment strategies and expectations must be developed.
Saturday, September 29, 2007
Protecting the Quarterback
Recently the local paper, The Mountain Press had an editorial, Protecting the Quarterback.
They wrote about the ranting done by the coach of Oklahoma State University’s football team. The coach was upset over a column in the newspaper critical of his second-string quarterback. The column suggested the quarterback had a bad attitude……. Then they wrote “It’s hard to know how far to go in critiquing and analyzing college athletes. They’re amateurs for sure but……”
They wrote about the ranting done by the coach of Oklahoma State University’s football team. The coach was upset over a column in the newspaper critical of his second-string quarterback. The column suggested the quarterback had a bad attitude……. Then they wrote “It’s hard to know how far to go in critiquing and analyzing college athletes. They’re amateurs for sure but……”
Later in the same edition there was an article attributed to The Associated Press under a headline Vols’ Lincoln tunes out distractions. In the article the author wrote about Fulmer’s Boot Camp where “Some of it can’t be put into print, most of it can’t. It’s been everything from trying to distract you. Standing behind you talking, yelling at you while you’re doing it. Get hit in the head with things, having to run stadiums if you miss something or you get a kick blocked.” I’m not an expert in writing in the English language but I believe The Associated Press’s sentence structure would not be looked upon favorably by an English teacher.
Now back to your editorial ……..college sports are a multimillion dollar business, and people fork over hundreds, thousands, of dollars to get good seats to support the team.
Now let’s think for a minute. Is Coach Fulmer a sadist? Is he the only football coach who abuses players in attempts to get them to do better and maybe even their best?
Do you suppose Oklahoma State University’s Coach Gundy just did not like someone criticizing his player? A woman criticize him? Football is a man’s sport. Coach Gundy has charged that reporter Carlson’s article is 3/4ths errors but refuses to identify the errors. Do you suppose Coach Gundy may have been upset over his defense allowing a school record 718 yards or that they helped the opposition’s quarterback rack up the fourth-highest passing total in major college football history, which in turn dropped his team to 116th in the nation in pass defense? Only three teams have worse marks.
Maybe Coach Gundy was distracted and a reporter asked him the wrong question at the wrong time. This is not the first time Gundy has overreacted. Maybe it is because his program lives in a huge shadow in its own state (ever hear of Oklahoma?) and is an afterthought in the national conversation. Maybe Coach Gundy just wants his super-secret, sacrosanct program to be accountable to no one.
Now back to your editorial ……..college sports are a multimillion dollar business, and people fork over hundreds, thousands, of dollars to get good seats to support the team.
Now let’s think for a minute. Is Coach Fulmer a sadist? Is he the only football coach who abuses players in attempts to get them to do better and maybe even their best?
Do you suppose Oklahoma State University’s Coach Gundy just did not like someone criticizing his player? A woman criticize him? Football is a man’s sport. Coach Gundy has charged that reporter Carlson’s article is 3/4ths errors but refuses to identify the errors. Do you suppose Coach Gundy may have been upset over his defense allowing a school record 718 yards or that they helped the opposition’s quarterback rack up the fourth-highest passing total in major college football history, which in turn dropped his team to 116th in the nation in pass defense? Only three teams have worse marks.
Maybe Coach Gundy was distracted and a reporter asked him the wrong question at the wrong time. This is not the first time Gundy has overreacted. Maybe it is because his program lives in a huge shadow in its own state (ever hear of Oklahoma?) and is an afterthought in the national conversation. Maybe Coach Gundy just wants his super-secret, sacrosanct program to be accountable to no one.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)