Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Could Hillary Possibly Be Right About Iraq?
Sen Clinton said the Iraqi government has not met any benchmarks required of them at least not on time and she believes they will continue to fail until they are convinced we are leaving. She just may be right...
Civil War, Viet Nam, Korea
What is the difference between the United States, during the Civil War, and Viet Nam and Korea?
We fought to keep the United States one nation and we fight or fought to keep Viet Nam and Korea split. Does that make sense?
We fought to keep the United States one nation and we fight or fought to keep Viet Nam and Korea split. Does that make sense?
Immigrants and Benjamin Franklin
As we look at how immigrants are changing our country today it might be interesting to look back and see how it was. Recently I read a book about the Americanization of Benjamin Franklin. You might be interested to know he was not nearly as esteemed during his lifetime as he is today. Apparently it is easier to esteem someone we never met.
Pennsylvania was founded in 1681 by William Penn as a refuge for his fellow Quakers. It was a fast-growing colony continually beset by factionalism and conflict between its legislature and its Penn family---controlled executive. Its population, in 1750, was around 120,000 making Pennsylvania the fourth largest colony after Virginia, Massachusetts, and Maryland. Twenty years later it was the second largest colony. The lack of any established church and the Quakers’ reputation for religious toleration attracted a most varied mixture of religious groups. By mid-century the Quakers had become a minority in their own colony at just below 1/4th the population. (I bet they wished they could have closed their borders.) Scotch-Irish Presbyterians made up another quarter and Germans, composed of a wide assortment of religious sects totaled about 40 percent. Favoring the Quaker policies of pacifism, no militia, and low taxes the Germans tacitly agreed to let a Quaker oligarchy run the assembly. Indian problems on the frontier where most of the Scotch-Irish were settled, and that fact that the Penn family, which had converted to Anglicanism, refused to pay what many though was its fair share of taxes, meant that politics in the colony was contentious and turbulent. The bulk of the population of Pennsylvania thought the Penns should do more to pay for the costs of supporting the colony. Above all they should permit the assembly to tax the hundreds of thousands of acres of proprietary lands the Penn family had not yet granted or sold to settlers.
The massive immigration of Germans into Pennsylvania was considered a major problem. “Why should the Germans be suffered to swarm into our settlements, and by herding together establish their language and manners to the exclusion of ours?” The early settlers wanted to exclude all Germans and black people from the New World. They thought the country should belong to only the English and the Indians, the white and the red.
Not much has changed other than the invaders.
Benjamin Franklin thought the Pennsylvania government neglected the defense of the colony against America’s French and Indian enemies. When the Legislature did not act to defend the colony in 1747, Benjamin Franklin almost single-handedly raised 10,000 armed men in the Militia Association and organized lotteries to raise funds to purchase weapons and ammunition and to build defenses on the Delaware River.
Imagine if someone would do that today.
Some things don't change.
Pennsylvania was founded in 1681 by William Penn as a refuge for his fellow Quakers. It was a fast-growing colony continually beset by factionalism and conflict between its legislature and its Penn family---controlled executive. Its population, in 1750, was around 120,000 making Pennsylvania the fourth largest colony after Virginia, Massachusetts, and Maryland. Twenty years later it was the second largest colony. The lack of any established church and the Quakers’ reputation for religious toleration attracted a most varied mixture of religious groups. By mid-century the Quakers had become a minority in their own colony at just below 1/4th the population. (I bet they wished they could have closed their borders.) Scotch-Irish Presbyterians made up another quarter and Germans, composed of a wide assortment of religious sects totaled about 40 percent. Favoring the Quaker policies of pacifism, no militia, and low taxes the Germans tacitly agreed to let a Quaker oligarchy run the assembly. Indian problems on the frontier where most of the Scotch-Irish were settled, and that fact that the Penn family, which had converted to Anglicanism, refused to pay what many though was its fair share of taxes, meant that politics in the colony was contentious and turbulent. The bulk of the population of Pennsylvania thought the Penns should do more to pay for the costs of supporting the colony. Above all they should permit the assembly to tax the hundreds of thousands of acres of proprietary lands the Penn family had not yet granted or sold to settlers.
The massive immigration of Germans into Pennsylvania was considered a major problem. “Why should the Germans be suffered to swarm into our settlements, and by herding together establish their language and manners to the exclusion of ours?” The early settlers wanted to exclude all Germans and black people from the New World. They thought the country should belong to only the English and the Indians, the white and the red.
Not much has changed other than the invaders.
Benjamin Franklin thought the Pennsylvania government neglected the defense of the colony against America’s French and Indian enemies. When the Legislature did not act to defend the colony in 1747, Benjamin Franklin almost single-handedly raised 10,000 armed men in the Militia Association and organized lotteries to raise funds to purchase weapons and ammunition and to build defenses on the Delaware River.
Imagine if someone would do that today.
Some things don't change.
Monday, May 05, 2008
Lately the FLDS vs. Texas has been the news. Police, using what they say was a telephone plea for help, raided a compound, removing over 400 children. The court jumped at the chance to get involved and has arranged for the children to be separated from their mothers.
Most states set the minimum age to marry between and including 14-18 with New Hampshire setting the minimum age for girls at 13. In Utah for those 15 years old, parental consent must be obtained, approval from Juvenile Court is necessary with the court concluding the marriage is voluntary and in the best interests of the minor. In the best interests of the minor; I wonder what that includes and I wonder if the judge is a member of FLDS? Is that the fox watching the chickens? It is law is it right?
Throughout most of the 19th century, the minimum age of consent for sexual intercourse in many of the states was 10 years old. In Delaware it was seven; as late as 1930 twelve states allowed boys as young as 14 and girls as young as 12 to marry with parental consent.
Governments have problems regulating things:
If the state decides that marriage at 7 years is OK does that make it right? If the state decides that marriage at 7 years is not OK does it make it wrong. Who is to decide these matters and how do they decide? The courts have shown they are not capable of such decisions.
Most states set the minimum age to marry between and including 14-18 with New Hampshire setting the minimum age for girls at 13. In Utah for those 15 years old, parental consent must be obtained, approval from Juvenile Court is necessary with the court concluding the marriage is voluntary and in the best interests of the minor. In the best interests of the minor; I wonder what that includes and I wonder if the judge is a member of FLDS? Is that the fox watching the chickens? It is law is it right?
Throughout most of the 19th century, the minimum age of consent for sexual intercourse in many of the states was 10 years old. In Delaware it was seven; as late as 1930 twelve states allowed boys as young as 14 and girls as young as 12 to marry with parental consent.
Governments have problems regulating things:
- The Oregon legislature barred marriages between white people and anyone more than one-quarter black in 1859, just three years after statehood. (It also imposed a $5 tax on black, Chinese, Hawaiian and “mulatto” people.) A few years later, the legislature extended the ban to marriage between whites and “any Negro, Chinese, or any person having one fourth or more Negro, Chinese, or Kanaka (native Hawaiian) blood, or any person having more than one-half Indian blood.” No other state referenced Kanakas, and Nevada was the only other state to mention Chinese.
- Married women were not allowed to make legal contracts in twelve states until 1940.
- The sale of birth control devices to married couples was forbidden until 1965. In the early half of the 1900s contraception was charged with “perversion of natural function,” morality” and “fostering egotism and enervating self-indulgence.”
- Interracial marriage was forbidden and punishable by prison in 13 states until 1967.
If the state decides that marriage at 7 years is OK does that make it right? If the state decides that marriage at 7 years is not OK does it make it wrong. Who is to decide these matters and how do they decide? The courts have shown they are not capable of such decisions.
Imagine how it will be for our great-grandchildren
On the subject of adolescence a couple of stories recently in The Mountain Press. One, we have Miley Cyrus, I believe she is 15 years old, embarrassed over photographs she had taken of her by a professional photographer. Photographs approved by her parents. Photographs that have been called “risqué.” Second, we have a singing group, the Naked Brothers, 10 and 13 years old respectively appearing at Wal-Mart promoting their latest DVD “I Don’t Want to Go to School.”
Miley appears on the Disney Channel and the Naked Brothers appear on the Nicolodean channel. Both considered to be “kid friendly and family oriented.” Not so recently we have Jamie Spears, 16-years old, unmarried, pregnant on the Nicolodean channel's most popular show.
The world has changed. The transition between childhood and adulthood is much longer today than it was less than one hundred years ago, when a boy proved himself a man when he could shoulder and share adult hardships, risks, and responsibility working side by side with his father in the fields. By the time he was a seasoned seventeen or eighteen, he was ready to start his own family. A girl became a woman by the time she reached childbearing age; fourteen or fifteen was often considered old enough to marry. The transition from childhood to adulthood was so short that adolescence---at least as the distinct stage of life we now consider it---hardly existed.
Today the traditional determinations of adulthood---the establishment of occupation and family---are routinely postponed until after college. With the period of childhood innocence seeming shorter and shorter, we’ve created a new ten-or-twelve-or-more-years-long designation, a no-man’s land (or no-woman’s land) we term adolescence. Over the past fifty-years or so, this new limbo-land life stage has become an extended period of awkward uncertainty.
We have stretched adolescence further than anytime in history. Any child of any age, with the click of a mouse, can see naked people performing sexual activities of all persuasions, “meet” complete strangers while in their own homes while their parents cross their fingers and hope for the best.
Imagine how it will be for our great-grandchildren.
Miley appears on the Disney Channel and the Naked Brothers appear on the Nicolodean channel. Both considered to be “kid friendly and family oriented.” Not so recently we have Jamie Spears, 16-years old, unmarried, pregnant on the Nicolodean channel's most popular show.
The world has changed. The transition between childhood and adulthood is much longer today than it was less than one hundred years ago, when a boy proved himself a man when he could shoulder and share adult hardships, risks, and responsibility working side by side with his father in the fields. By the time he was a seasoned seventeen or eighteen, he was ready to start his own family. A girl became a woman by the time she reached childbearing age; fourteen or fifteen was often considered old enough to marry. The transition from childhood to adulthood was so short that adolescence---at least as the distinct stage of life we now consider it---hardly existed.
Today the traditional determinations of adulthood---the establishment of occupation and family---are routinely postponed until after college. With the period of childhood innocence seeming shorter and shorter, we’ve created a new ten-or-twelve-or-more-years-long designation, a no-man’s land (or no-woman’s land) we term adolescence. Over the past fifty-years or so, this new limbo-land life stage has become an extended period of awkward uncertainty.
We have stretched adolescence further than anytime in history. Any child of any age, with the click of a mouse, can see naked people performing sexual activities of all persuasions, “meet” complete strangers while in their own homes while their parents cross their fingers and hope for the best.
Imagine how it will be for our great-grandchildren.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)