Friday, September 18, 2009

There Comes a Time in Every Person’s Life When a Decision is Required.

There comes a time in every person's life when a decision is required. And that decision, should you make it, will have a far-reaching effect on generations not yet born. Your example, your actions, even one decision can literally change the world.

One decision can literally change the world.

July second, eighteen sixty three, a school teacher from Maine was in the fight of his life.  Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, formerly a professor or rhetoric from Bowdoin College, currently a thirty-four-year-old colonel in the union army. The place is Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.

Chamberlain's troops were facing the Army of Northern Virginia, commanded by General Robert Lee. After five bloody attacks from the Rebels, Chamberlain's troops could not hold them off any longer.

More than half his regiment was dead, and many of the remaining soldiers were wounded. He was outnumbered more than five to one, and the last skirmish had taken place on both sides of the wall, face-to-face. He did not know how his troops had pushed the Rebels back down the hill. He found out later his men had been punching the enemy with their fists.

A quick survey told him there were less than two bullets per man remaining. For all intents and purposes his troops, the Twentieth Main was out of ammunition. He could see the attackers were preparing for a final assault. Looking at what seemed to be certain death, Chamberlain's officers advised retreat.

Chamberlain did not respond. He was thinking that the cost of staying where he was would be the same as running away.

His brother screamed at him to 'Give an order."

And so he did. Chamberlain he ordered his troops to 'fix bayonets!' His men thought he was crazy.

Then someone down the line yelled,"'They're coming!"

Chamberlain yelled "Fix bayonets, and Charge!" Chamberlain drew his sword, jumped on top of the wall and with the enemy less than 50 yards away, shouted "Charge!"

The men of the Twentieth Maine Regiment, the pride of the Army of the Potomac, poured over the wall and followed the schoolteacher into history.

The Confederate troop, upon seeing the leader of the opposition climb the wall, stopped unsure what was happening.  When Chamberlain pointed his sword at them and yelled "Charge!" they turned and ran. Many threw down loaded weapons. They were sure these must be reinforcements. It never occurred to them that a beaten regiment would charge.

In less than ten minutes, the ragged group under Chamberlain's command, without ammunition, captured the entire regiments of the Fifteenth Alabama and the Forty-seventh Alabama, more than four hundred men. It all happened because one man made a decision to charge.

And one decision that you make, can literally change the world.

You might be thinking that Colonel Joshua Chamberlain changed the outcome of only one small part of the battle. Consider this.

It was an accepted as fact, that at the time of the Battle of Gettysburg, the Union was losing badly. Confederate troops had taken Fort Sumter, routed the Union army at Manassas. Lee had won major victories at Richmond in the Battles of the Seven days and again at Manassas in the Second Battle of Bull Run. The South had won at Chancellorsville and crushed General Burnside at Fredericksburg.

Had the south been victorious at Gettysburg, historians agree that the war would have been over by the end of the summer. The Confederate States of America were one victory away from winning the war. But they did not win.

The schoolteacher from Maine was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for his decision at Little Round Top. His commanding officers determined that the actions of this one man saved the Union army from certain destruction. His decision had turned the tide of the battle. Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain turned the tide of the war.

If the South had won there would be no America as we have today. There would have been two possibly three countries existing in our place.  The world would not have a country beg enough and strong enough to feed the other nations of the world. There would be no superpower available to defend weaker countries against those who would limit their freedom.

When Hitler swept across Europe, when Hirohito invaded the islands of the Pacific, when Saddam Hussein's armies rolled into Kuwait, a United States of America was there to stop them.  We were there because of one man, with his back to the wall, a man whose only option appeared to be to retreat. The world as it exists today is largely the result of a decision to charge—made by a schoolteacher over a hundred years ago.

Joshua Chamberlain made a decision that changed the world but it also held personal rewards. He led successful campaigns until the end of the war. He was cited four separate times for bravery in action and was promoted by special order of Ulysses S. Grant to brigadier general for heroism at Petersburg.  A few months later for heroism at Five Forks, he was promoted to Major General.

From all Union Officers, President Lincoln chose Chamberlain to have the honor of accepting the Confederate surrender at Appomattox. There he stunned the world with a show of forgiveness and respect as he ordered his troops to attention, saluting General Robert E Lee and his army.

Back home in Maine, Chamberlain was elected governor in what is, to this day, the largest majority in the history of the state. He was reelected three times until he finally stepped down and accepted the position of president of Bowdoin College.

An interesting benefit of a person's decision to charge is the presence of a hedge of thorns. Mentioned in the Bible, a hedge of thorns is divine protection placed upon the person who is destined to make a difference. Until you have accomplished what you were put here to do, you will not, you cannot be harmed.  Joshua Chamberlain, on that hill in Pennsylvania, with his decision not yet made and all his victories before him, was wrapped in the protection of a hedge of thorns.

I have a copy of the contents of a letter addressed to the Honorable Governor Joshua L. Chamberlain. It arrived at the statehouse in Maine, several years after the war.

 

Dear Sir:

 

I want to tell you of a little passage in the Battle of Round Top, Gettysburg, concerning you and me, which I am now glad of. Twice in that fight I had your life in my hands. I got a safe place between two rocks, and drew bead fair and square on you. You were standing in the open behind the center of your line, full exposed. I knew your rank by your uniform and actions, and I thought it a mighty good thing to put you out of the way. I rested my gun on the rock and took steady aim. I started to pull the trigger, but some queer notion stopped me. Then I got ashamed of my weakness and went through the same motions again. I had you, perfectly certain. But that same queer something shut right down on me. I couldn't pull the trigger, and gave it up---that is, your life. I am glad of it now, and hope you are.

 

Yours truly,

A member of the Fifteenth Alabama

 

Our story, our circumstances may not be as dramatic as those of Joshua Chamberlain, but the stakes are exactly the same. There comes a time in every person's life when a decision is required. And that decision, should we make it, will have a far-reaching effect on generations yet unborn. One decision that we make will literally change the world.

 

A decision to charge………so do it. Change your life. Charge…………..

 

Sweat the Small Stuff

Have you ever been bitten by an elephant? How about a mosquito? It's the small stuff that will get you.

A few years ago, a squirrel climbed onto the Metro-North Railroad power lines near New York City. He set off an electrical surge, which weakened an overhead bracket. The bracket allowed a wire to dangle toward the tracks. The wire tangled in a train that tore down all the lines. As a result, forty-seven thousand commuters were stranded in Manhattan for hours that evening.

Remember the Hubble Space Telescope? It was conceived in 1946 and cost $2.5 billion to produce. Yet when it was launched into orbit, NASA discovered that a particular lens had been ground 1/1000th of an inch less than it should have been. That "little thing" until it was repaired by astronauts, rendered the most expensive telescope in history no better than a good one on the ground.

Then there was Napoleon: a tiny part of the battle became immensely important to Napoleon when he defeated Wellington at Waterloo. But wasn't Waterloo Napoleon's greatest defeat?

On the eighteenth of June 1815, Napoleon did indeed suffer his greatest defeat---an unmitigated disaster---at Waterloo. But that was only after he had won!

Napoleon had brilliantly outmaneuvered Wellington's 77,000 men---this in addition to the more than 100,000 Prussians nearby. Together, those armies easily outnumbered Napoleon's 76,000, but when he got in between them, Napoleon prevented the two from combining. He had already beaten the Prussians two days before, so he detached a part of his force to hold them at bay while pointing the rest of his army toward Wellington and the British.

Napoleon began the battle at a bit after eleven in the morning with an artillery barrage and an initial assault against the British right flank. Pushing back and forth most of the day, at one point Napoleon watched from a hillside as his troops pushed past Wellington's lines, capturing almost all of the 160 British cannons.

Muzzle-loading cannons were packed with black gunpowder, wadding, and a projectile of some sort. The touchhole of the cannon was then contacted with a flaming torch, which ignited the powder and fired the cannon.

It was customary in those days for several of the troops to carry small metal rods---nails---with them in the event they overran the enemy's guns. The metal rods were then hammered into the cannon's touchhole, rendering it useless. When Napoleon's men overran Wellington's position---and his cannons---it became immediately apparent that there were no spikes among his troops. As Napoleon screamed from the hilltop for the cannons to be destroyed, he watched Wellington's men retake the guns and turn them on their attackers. Napoleon was defeated…and all for lack of a fistful of nails.

·         Sacajawea was the daughter of a Shoshone.

·         Sacagawea was born in the eastern part of what is now the state of Idaho. Her people, the Lemhi Shoshone, or Snake People, spent much of the year traveling in small groups.

·         When Sacagawea was around 10 years old, her group was camped near the three forks of the Missouri River. Suddenly, a band of Hidatsa attacked. The Shoshone bows and arrows were useless against the Hidatsa's rifles. Sacagawea and others were captured and taken back to the Hidatsa villages near present-day Stanton, North Dakota.

·         Within a few years of arriving at the Hidatsa village, Sacagawea was sold or lost in a gambling wager to Toussaint Charbonneau, a French-Canadian trader. The marriage was not a love match. Charbonneau had the typical trader's attitude toward Indian women--they were very good workers.

·         Sacajawea was about 16 years old when she and her husband, a French-Canadian trapper named Toussaint Charbonneau, joined the group of explorers.

·         Sacajawea was pregnant at the time with her first child.

·         During the trip, she gave birth to a son. On February 11th, 1805, Sacagawea went into a long, difficult labor. She gave birth to a boy, whom Charbonneau named Jean Baptiste. She called him Pomp, meaning 'first born' in Shoshone.

·         When the Corps of Discovery encountered Shoshone Indians, Sacajawea discovered that their leader was her brother, Cameahwait. Sacagawea learned that most of her family were dead. Only two brothers and her oldest sister's child remained.

·         Lewis and Clark purchased horses from the Shoshones. They used the horses to cross the Rocky Mountains.

·         Sacajawea contributed to the success of the Lewis and Clark Expedition by serving as an interpreter, finding edible plants, and saving important documents and supplies when a boat capsized.

 

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Carter is the Racist

Anyone who considers President Obama a Negro, or Black person is the racist. He is as much white as he is black. Carter is truly talking about the color of Obama's skin and that is against everything MLK jr stood for.

Jimmy Carter is an old white man from rural Georgia. He probably thinks of Obama as a "N" who does not know his place. And thinks everyone else thinks so too.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Advertising's Conventional Wisdom

Listerine was invented in the nineteenth century as a powerful surgical antiseptic. It was sold, in distilled form, as a floor cleaner and a cure for gonorrhea. Success did not come until the 1920s when it was pitched as a solution for "chronic halitosis"---an obscure medical term for bad breath. The advertising featured young women and men eager for marriage but turned off by their mate's rotten breath. Until that time, bad breath was not conventionally considered such a catastrophe.Listerine did not make mouthwash as much as it made halitosis. In seven years revenues went from $155,000 to $ 8 million.

Conventional Wisdom

John Kenneth Galbraith coined the phrase "conventional wisdom." He did not consider it a compliment. He wrote "We associate truth with convenience, with what most closely accords with self-interest and personal well-being or promises best to avoid awkward effort or unwelcome dislocation of life. We also find highly acceptable what contributes most to self-esteem." Economic and social behaviors "are complex, and to comprehend their character is mentally tiring. Therefore we adhere, as though to a raft, to those ideas which represent our understanding." In his view conventional wisdom must be convenient, comfortable, and comforting---though not necessarily true. While it would be silly to argue that conventional wisdom is never true noticing where it may be false or possibly sloppy or self-interested thinking is worth questioning.

During the 1980s advocates for the homeless told us there were 3 million homeless Americans. We all sat up and took notice but more than 1 of every 100 people were homeless? That seemed high but experts said it. The same expert said 45 homeless people die each second---which would mean 1.4 billion dead homeless every year. At the time the U.S. population was about 25 million. Even if they meant to say that one homeless person died every forty-five seconds, that's still 701,000 dead homeless people every year. Roughly one-third of all deaths in the United States. Makes one wonder.. When pressed on the figure of 3 million homeless, they admitted it was a fabricated number. Journalists had been hounding them for a specific number and they did not want them to walk away empty-handed.

Watch your television sets for examples of "conventional wisdom.".

Thinking like a criminal

The longer one is a believer the less they think like an unbeliever. Not being criminals limits our understanding of how criminals think. We might want to give it a try when it comes to our justice system.

Given the rarity with which executions are carried out in the is country and the long delays in doing so, no reasonable criminal is deterred by the threat of execution. Even though capital punishment quadrupled within a decade there were only 478 executions in the entire United States during the 1990s. Any parent knows the difference between deterrent and empty threat, "Okay, I'm going to count to ten and this time I'm really going to punish you." Among prisoners on death row, the annual execution rate is 2 percent---compared with the 7 percent annual chance of dying faced by a member of a typical gang that distributes crack. If life on death row is safer than life on the streets its hard to believe the fear of execution is a driving force in a criminal's calculus.

Sometime I will have to explain how legalizing abortions in the 70s led to a major drop in crime in the 90s.

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

Robert Todd Lincoln's Knack for Being Near Assassinations

Lee's surrender wasn't the only history Lincoln ended up witnessing, although things got a bit grislier for him after Appomattox. As he arrived back in Washington in April 1865, Lincoln's parents invited him to go see Our American Cousin at Ford's Theater with them. The young officer was so exhausted after his journey that he begged off so he could get a good night's sleep. That night, of course, John Wilkes Booth shot Lincoln's father, and Robert Todd was with the celebrated president when he passed away the next morning.

By 1881, Lincoln's political lineage and prominence as a lawyer qualified him for a national office, and he became Secretary of War under the newly inaugurated James A. Garfield. That July, Lincoln was scheduled to travel to Elberon, New Jersey, by train with the President, but the trip never took off. Before Lincoln and Garfield's train could leave the station, Charles Guiteau shot Garfield, who died of complications from the wound two months later.

Oddly, that wasn't all for Lincoln, though. Two decades passed without a presidential assassination, but Lincoln's strange luck reared its head again in 1901. Lincoln traveled to Buffalo at the invitation of President William McKinley to attend the Pan-American Exposition. Although he arrived a bit late to the even, Lincoln was on his way to meet McKinley when anarchist Leon Czolgosz shot the president twice at close range.

Following these three bits of bad luck Lincoln refused to attend any presidential functions.

Thursday, September 03, 2009

Speak in Such a Way That You Make Others Want to Listen / ---Steven K. Scott

For most people, speaking means simply saying whatever they feel like saying. People say what they think or feel as think or feel it, regardless of its validity or appropriateness. When you have something that you really want the other person to clearly understand and embrace, you need to communicate in a way that makes it palatable. A wise man or woman does whatever it takes to make what they have to say easy to swallow.
 

"The tongue of the wise makes knowledge acceptable, But the mouth of fools spouts folly." Proverbs 15:2

Monday, August 24, 2009

Talk Show Hosts . . .

For Glen Beck to consider Obama a hater of white people identifies Beck as racist. Obama is 1/2 black and 1/2 white.  Tiger Woods is more asian than black. To consider either Obama or Woods "black" shows one is racist . . . and stupid. Hopefully Glen Beck will go the way of Don Imus . . .

--
Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

The Comma Sutra, Making Grammar Sexy Since 1875

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Cash for Clunkers

Cash for Clunkers is just another government handout except this time to people with money. We have become a country of parasites.

Saturday, August 15, 2009

Health Care - Letter to Rep Roe, and Sens Corker and Alexander

Having a government run health care system is similar to having a benign dictator instead of a democracy. The problem is, who selects the dictator. Without competition there is no motivation to keep costs low. Living in a Republic requires risks and failures. We cannot afford to do what we can do, less than a half century ago 70-years-old men and women died when they developed serious diseases. Newborn babies died when they were born with serious diseases. Today we can keep them alive at the cost of millions of dollars. If you want to help you will keep government out of the health care industry.

The unfortunate part is that our senators and representatives, you, are not with the people. You have separated yourself from the people. You have given yourself a Health Care plan better than the one you will give the people you represent. It is truly the Federal Government against the people.

Remember the French Revolution? France still practiced feudalism in the 18th century. The nobles and clergy enjoyed special privileges. They did not have to pay taxes. The common people did not have power and freedom in politics. They worked hard and had to pay heavy taxes. The nobles and clergy made up the First and Second Estates in the Estates General. The common people (i.e. the middle class (bourgeoisie), peasants and artisans) made up the Third Estate. The nobles and clergy could outvote the common people easily though the Estates General was always not called by the king, who ruled as an absolute monarch. The common people became discontented with the privileged classes. Sound familiar?

Louis XIV had spent too much. His successors did not cut down expenses. Louis XVI also failed to improve the financial situation. He dismissed ministers who tried to introduce financial reforms. By 1789, the government was bankrupt. Sound familiar?

When Louis XVI finally called the Estates General to solve financial difficulties, the Third Estate did not agree with the unfair system of the Estates General. They formed the National Assembly to make a constitution. People were afraid that the king would suppress the National Assembly. The hungry Parisians, who suffered from bad harvest, burst out their anger by attacking the Bastille prison (for political prisoners). The Fall of Bastille started the French Revolution. It spread out to other parts of France. Sound familiar?

Keep that in mind when you consider your position on Nationalizing Health Care. When you take the United States of America into socialism.

This is a sad time for We the people.

Friday, August 14, 2009

The Warren Harding Error

Recently I was reading about the subconscious decisions we make. On the conscious level we do not treat tall people differently than we treat short people. But there is plenty of evidence to suggest that height---particularly in men---triggers a certain set of very positive unconscious associations. About half the companies on the Fortune 500 list were asked questions about its CEO. Overwhelmingly, the heads of big companies are white men. But they are also almost all tall: on average, male CEOs were just a shade under six feet tall. Given the average male is five foot nine, that means that CEOs as a group have about three inches on the rest of their gender. This statistic understates the matter. In the U.S. population, about 14.5 percent of all men are six feet or taller. Among CEOs of Fortune 500 companies, that number is 58 percent. In the general American population, 3.9 percent of adult men are six feet two or taller. Among the CEO sample, almost a third were six feet two or taller.

It is possible to staff a large company with white males but it is not possible to staff a large company without short people. There simply aren't enough tall people around. Yet few of those short people ever make it to the executive suite. Being short is probably as much a handicap to corporate success as being a woman or an African American.

This stereotyping is not limited to the executive suite. Researchers who analyzed four large studies that had followed thousands of people from birth to adulthood calculated that when corrected for variables such as age and gender and weight, an inch of height is worth $789 a year in salary. That means that a person who is six feet tall but otherwise identical to someone who is five foot five will make on average $5,525 more per year. One of the authors, Timothy Judge, points out, "If you take this over the course of a 30-year career and compound it, we're talking about a tall person enjoying literally hundreds of thousands of dollars of earnings advantage."

It appears when making some very important decisions we may not be as rational as we think.


What is called the Warren Harding Error is, in its simplest form, the decision he would make a good president based solely on his appearance which was tall, dark, and handsome. The word "Roman" was occasionally used in descriptions of him. He served two years before dying unexpectedly of a stroke. He was, most historians agree, one of the worst presidents in American history.

Abilene Paradox -- Jerry B. Harvey

On a hot afternoon in Coleman, Texas, the story goes; a family is comfortably playing dominoes on a porch, until the father-in-law suggests they take a trip to Abilene, fifty-three miles north, for dinner. The wife says, "Sounds like a great idea." The husband, despite having reservations because the drive is long and hot, thinks that his preferences must be out of step with the group and says, "Sounds good to me. I just hope your mother wants to go." The mother-in-law then says, Of course I want to go. I haven't been to Abilene in a long time." The drive is hot, dusty and long. When they arrive at the cafeteria, the food is bad. They arrive back home four hours later, exhausted. One of them dishonestly says, "It was a great trip, wasn't it?"

The mother-in-law says that, actually, she would rather have stayed home, but went along since the other three were so enthusiastic." The husband says, "I didn't want to go . I only went to satisfy the rest of you." The wife says, "I just went along to keep you happy. I would have to be crazy to want to go out in the heat like that." The father-in-law says that he only suggested it because he thought the others might be bored.

The group sits back, perplexed that they together decided to take a trip which none of them wanted. They each would have preferred to sit comfortably, but did not admit to it when they still had time to enjoy the afternoon.

This is a benign but dramatic illustration of the consequences of groupthink. Every member of the group agreed to do something they didn't want to do because they thought the others were committed to doing it. The result was that no one came away happy.

Teamwork -- Patrick Lencioni

"If you could get all the people in an organization rowing in the same direction, you could dominate any industry, in any market, against any competition, at any time."

What Makes Someone or Something Persuasive? -- ---Malcolm Gladwell

During the 1984 presidential campaign between Ronald Reagan and Walter Mondale  for eight days prior to the election, a group of psychologists led by Brian Mullen of Syracuse University videotaped the three national nightly news programs which at the time were anchored by Peter Jennings at ABC, Tom Brokaw at NBC and Dan rather at CBS. Mullen examined the tapes and excerpted all references to the candidates, until he had 37 separate segments, each roughly two and a half seconds long. Those segments were then shown, with the sound turned off, to a group of randomly chosen people, who were asked to rate the facial expressions of each newscaster in each segment. The subjects had no idea what kind of experiment they were involved with, or what the newscasters were talking about. They were simply asked to score the emotional content of the expressions of these three men on a 21-point scale, with the lowest being "extremely negative" and the highest point on the scale "extremely positive."

The results were fascinating. Dan Rather scored 10.46---which translates to an almost perfectly neutral expression---when he talked about Mondale and 10.37 when he talked about Reagan. He looked the same when he talked about the Republican as he did when he talked about the Democrat.  The same was true for Brokaw, who scored 11.21 for Mondale and 11.50 for Reagan. But Peter Jennings of ABC was much different. For Mondale he scored 13.38. But when he talked about Reagan, his face lit up so much he scored 17.44. Mullen and his colleagues tried to come up with an innocent explanation. Could it be Jennings is just more expressive in general than his colleagues? The answer seemed to be no.

Now here is where the study gets interesting. Mullen and his colleagues then called up people in a number of cities around the country who regularly watch the evening network news and asked them who they voted for. In every case, those who watched ABC voted for Reagan in far greater numbers than those who watched CBS or NBC. In Cleveland, 75 percent of ABC watchers voted Republican versus 61.9 percent of CBS or NBC viewers. In Williamstown, Massachusetts, ABC viewers were 71.4 percent for Reagan versus 50 percent for the other two networks; in Erie, Pennsylvania, the difference was 73.7 percent to 50 percent. The subtle pro Reagan bias in Jennings's face seems to have influenced the voting behavior of ABC viewers.

Thinking the results may have been simply a fluke, four years later, in the Michael Dukakis---George Bush campaign, Mullen repeated his experiment, with the exact same results. "Jennings showed more smiles when referring to the Republican candidate than the Democrat," Mullen said, "and again in a phone survey, viewers who watch ABC were more likely to have voted for Bush."

The Lion and the Dolphin

The king of the jungle was walking along the seashore one day and saw a dolphin breaking the surface of the water.

"Brother Dolphin," said the lion, "how fortuitous that we should meet! I'm king of the jungle and you're king of the fish. It makes perfect sense to me that we join forces, become allies, and rule earth and water."

"Your proposal makes a lot of sense," the dolphin replied. "Let's become partners."

Not long after, the lion was again walking along the shore when a wild bull challenged him. The bull turned out to be a fierce fighter and pinned down the king of beasts. The lion called to the dolphin for help. The dolphin heard the lion's cry and earnestly wanted to join the battle, but couldn't leave the sea. Eventually the lion prevailed, and the wild bull fled into the woods.

At that point, the lion began to scold the dolphin: "a fine ally you turned out to be. I could have been killed. You didn't do anything to help me."

"Don't blame me," said the dolphin. "Instead, blame nature, which made me swift and mighty in the sea but useless on land."

Aesop's Moral:

when choosing allies, consider their abilities as well as their willingness to help.

Cheyne and W

W and Cheney will eventually have to respond to charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity we can expect future finger pointing between the two and what used to be their staffs. For Bush to have gone soft would require him to believe he was wrong and that will never happen. 

--
Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

Veni Vidi Wiki: I came. I saw. I edited collaboratively.

Over populating

As with the animal kingdom, people over populating puts a strain on food and water. And, as with the animal kingdom people over populating will be taken care of by starvation. So, let India and China have as many children as they like. Nature will take care of the overage. The United States must stay out of it and be prepared for war.

--
Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

Veni Vidi Wiki: I came. I saw. I edited collaboratively.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Bonuses for Not Finding Another Job

City Manager:

City Commissioners:

 

I am:

 

John Jenkins

425 Patterson Lane

Gatlinburg, TN 37738

865-430-4427

 

Reference longevity bonuses:

 

Bonuses are for performance beyond what is expected for one to remain hired not just because a person has no place else to go thus remaining in the current position. As the 80/20 rule attests, 20% of city employees are doing 80% of the productive work. 5%-10% should be fired and 5%-10% deserve recognition bonuses. When asked the question "How many people work for the city?" any answer other than "About half." is an exaggeration. By giving additional money for just being present degrades and insults the system.

 

Mayor Jerry Hayes should resign. He was not elected to abstain. Every one of you should go on the record as for or against every vote unless you have a personal stake in the vote. On this vote Mayor Hayes is an observer and like 5%-10% of the city employees should be fired. Since he is elected he did what all politicians do and that is stand solidly for and against anything.

 

Get rid of bonuses for any reason other than outstanding performance and make sure the person doing the rating is not a relative or a member of the same church or a neighbor. Congratulations to Commissioner McCown for being the only one to not cave to internal politics.



--
Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

Veni Vidi Wiki: I came. I saw. I edited collaboratively.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Hillary and the translator

Am I the only person stunned that the United States does not take its own translators on trips to non-English speaking countries? Translators can start wars with their mistakes. Remember Jimmy Carter and the Polish?

--
Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

Veni Vidi Wiki: I came. I saw. I edited collaboratively.

Tuesday, August 04, 2009

Showing Their Appreciation

We can only imagine how the two journalists expressed their "personal" thanks for whatever Billy did for them. Being released by the morons of North Korea they wanted to do Billy, that should be do for Billy.

--
Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

Veni Vidi Wiki: I came. I saw. I edited collaboratively.