Tuesday, September 29, 2009

KIPP (Knowledge is Power Program)

I read this in a book Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell.



KIPP (Knowledge is Power Program) is a middle school. Classes are large: the fifth grade has two sections of thirty-five students each. There are no entrance exams or admission requirements. Students are chosen by lottery, with any fourth grader living in the Bronx eligible to apply. Roughly half of the students are African American; the rest are Hispanic. Three-quarters of the children come from single-parent homes. Ninety percent qualify for "free or reduced lunch," which is to say that their families earn so little that the federal government chips in so the children can eat properly at lunchtime.


KIPP Academy seems like the kind of school in the kind of neighborhood with the king of students tat would make educators despair---except that the minute you enter the building, it's clear that something is different. The students walk quietly down the hallways in single file. In the classroom, they are taught to turn and address anyone talking to them in a protocol known as "SSLANT": smile, sit up, listen, ask questions, nod when being spoken to, and track with your eyes. On the walls of the school's corridors are hundreds of pennants from the colleges that KIPP graduates have gone on to attend. Last year, hundreds of families from across the Bronx entered the lottery for KIPP'S two fifth-grade classes. It is no exaggeration to say that just over ten years into its existence, KIPP has become one of the most desirable public schools in New your city.


What KIPP is most famous for is mathematics. In the South Bronx, only about 16 percent of all middle school students are performing at or above their grade level in math. But at KIPP, by the end of the fifth grade, many of the students call math their favorite subject. In seventh grade, KIPP students start high school algebra. By the end of the eighth grade, 84 percent of the students are performing at or above grade level, which is to say that this motley group of randomly selected chosen lower-income kids from dingy apartments in one of the country's worst neighborhoods---whose parents, in an overwhelming number of cases, never set foot in college---do as well in mathematics as the privileged eighth graders of America's wealthy suburbs. "Our kids' reading is on point," said David Levin, who founded KIPP with a fellow teacher, Michael Feinberg, in 1994. They struggle a little bit with writing skills. But when they leave here, they rock in math.


"They start school at seven twenty-five," says David Levin of the students at the Bronx KIPP Academy. "They all do a course called thinking skills until seven-fifty five. They do ninety minutes of English, ninety minutes of math every day, except in fifth grade, where they do two hours of math a day. An hour of social science, an hour of music at least twice a week, and then you have an hour and fifteen minutes of orchestra on top of that. Everyone does orchestra. The day goes from seven twenty-five until five p.m. After five, there are homework clubs, detention, sports teams. There are kids here from seven twenty-five until seven p.m. If you take an average day, and you take out lunch and recess, our kids are spending fifty to sixty percent more time learning than the traditional public school."


On Saturdays they come in nine to one. In the summer, it's eight to two. By summer Levin refers to three extra weeks of school in July. These are precisely the kind of lower-income kids identified as losing ground over the long summer vacation, so KIPP's response is simply to not have a long summer vacation.


The beginning is hard by the end of the day they are restless. Part of it is endurance, part of it is motivation. Part of it is incentives and rewards and fund stuff. Part of it is good old-fashioned discipline. The kids know what the words "grit" and "self-control" mean.


A 5:45 wakeup is fairly typical of KIPP students, especially given the long bus and subway commutes that many have to get to school. A seventh grade music class of seventy students when asked for a show of hands on when the students woke up. A handful said they woke up after six. Three quarters said they woke up before six. Almost half said they woke before 5:30. One student said he sometimes wakes up at three or four a.m., to finish his homework from the night before, and then goes to sleep for a bit.


Marita is twelve-years old. She says, "I wake up at five-forty-five a.m. to get a head start. I brush my teeth, shower. I get some breakfast at school, if I am running late. Usually get yelled at because I am taking too long. I meet my friends at the bus stop and we get the number one bus.


I leave school at five p.m., if I don't lollygag around, then I will get home around five-thirty. Then I say hi to my mom really quickly and start my homework. And if it's not a lot of homework that day, it will take me two to three hours, and I'll be done around nine p.m., or ten-thirty p.m.


Sometimes my mom makes me break for dinner. I tell her I want to go straight through, but she says I have to eat. So around eight, she makes me break for dinner for, like, a half hour, and then back to work. Then usually after that, my mom wants to hear about school but I have to make it quick because I have to get in bed by eleven p.m. So I get all my stuff ready, and then I get into bed. I tell her all about the day and what happened, and by the time we are finished, she is on the brink of sleeping, so that's probably around eleven-fifteen. Then I go to sleep, and the next morning we do it all over again. We are in the same room. But it's a huge bedroom and you can split it into two, and we have beds on other sides. Me and my mom are very close."


She spoke in the matter–of-fact way children who have no way of knowing how unusually their situation is. She has the hours of a lawyer trying to make partner, or a medical resident. All that is missing are the dark circles under her eyes and a steaming cup of coffee, except that she is too young for either.

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Marines With Breast Cancer - Camp LeJeune

It would seem to even the the most obtuse that with the Marines ordering that 500,000 people we notified that they had been exposed is proof of a connection between the cancers and the camp. I imagine this is an example of government Health Care. Number 1 policy do not admit responsibility.

Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

HOBBITS are Tolkien Minorities

Fighting Terrorism on our Soil

In times of war soldiers of the enemy forces not in uniform, found behind our lines, are recognized as spies and executed. Why aren't our enemies in the war on Terror when found within the borders of the United States executed as spies. Seems appropriate to me.
 

Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

HOBBITS are Tolkien Minorities

Low Standards

That any network permits Joy Behar or any other person to use such horrible language is offensive. She may be smart but she has no language skills. Otherwise she could get her point across without the use of gutter language.
 

Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

HOBBITS are Tolkien Minorities

Talk about long names

Emperor Franz Joseph of Austria had the following name, a great reminder of the way in which the Habsburg Empire was cobbled together: His Imperial and Royal Apostolic Majesty, Franz Joseph I, By the Grace of God, Emperor of Austria, King of Hungary, King of Bohemia, King of Lombardy-Venetia, of Dalmatia, Croatia, Slavonia, Galicia, Lodomeria, and Illyria; King of Jerusalem, etc.., Archduke of Austria; Grand Duke of Tuscany and Krakow, Duke of Lorraine, of Salzburg, Styria, Carinthia, Carniola, and of the Bukovina; Grand Prince of Transylvania; Margrave of Morovia; Duke of Upper and Lower Silesia, of Modena, Parma, Piacenza, and Guastalla, of Auschwitz, Zator and Teschen, Friuli, Ragusa (Dubrovnik) and Zara (Zadar); Princely Count of Habsburg and Tyrol, of Kyburg, Gorizia and Gradisca; Prince of Trent (Trento) and Brixen; Margrave of Upper and Lower Lusatia and in Istria; Count of Hohenems, Feldkirch, Bregenz, Sonnenburg, etc.; Lord of Trieste, of Cattaro (Kotor), and in the Windic march; Grand Voivode of the Voivodship of Serbia, etc.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Re: Do the Math, See If You Agree

Thank goodness my truck makes more than 18mph......


On 9/25/09 7:37 PM, "John Jenkins" <jrjenki@gmail.com> wrote:

If you traded in a clunker worth $3500, you get $4500 off for an apparent "savings" of $1000.
 
However, you have to pay taxes on the $4500 come April 15th (something that no auto dealer will tell you). If you are in the 30% tax bracket, you will pay $1350 on that $4500.
 
So, rather than save $1000, you actually pay an extra $350 to the feds. In addition, you traded in a car that was most likely paid for. Now you have 4 or 5 years of payments on a car that you did not need nor in most cases want, that was costing you less to keep running than the payments that you will now be making.
 
But wait, it gets even better: you also got ripped off by the dealer.
 
For example, every dealer in LA was selling the Ford Focus with all the goodies including A/C, auto transmission, power windows, etc for $12,500 the month before the "cash for clunkers" program started.
 
When "cash for clunkers" came along, they stopped discounting them and instead sold them at the list price of $15,500. So, you paid $3000 more than you would have the month before. (Honda, Toyota, and Kia played the same list price game that Ford and Chevy did).
 
So lets do the final tally here:
 
You traded in a car worth: $3500
 
You got a discount of: $4500
 
---------
 
Net so far +$1000
 
But you have to pay: $1350 in taxes on the $4500 (Depending on your tax bracket)
 
--------
 
Net so far: -$350
 
And you paid: $3000 more than the car was selling for the month before
 
----------
 
Net -$3350
 
We could also add in the additional taxes (sales tax, state tax, etc.) on the extra $3000 that you paid for the car, along with the 5 years of interest on the car loan but lets just stop here.
 
So who actually made out on the deal? The feds collected taxes on the car along with taxes on the $4500 they "gave" you. The car dealers made an extra $3000 or more on every car they sold along with the kickbacks from the manufacturers and the loan companies. The manufacturers got to dump lots of cars they could not give away the month before. And many of the poor gullible consumers got saddled with even more debt that many cannot afford.
 
Somebody convinced Joe consumer that he was getting $4500 in "free" money from the "government" when in fact Joe was giving away his $3500 car and paying an additional $3350 for the privilege.

Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

HOBBITS are Tolkien Minorities

Do the Math, See If You Agree

If you traded in a clunker worth $3500, you get $4500 off for an apparent "savings" of $1000.

 

However, you have to pay taxes on the $4500 come April 15th (something that no auto dealer will tell you). If you are in the 30% tax bracket, you will pay $1350 on that $4500.

 

So, rather than save $1000, you actually pay an extra $350 to the feds. In addition, you traded in a car that was most likely paid for. Now you have 4 or 5 years of payments on a car that you did not need nor in most cases want, that was costing you less to keep running than the payments that you will now be making.

 

But wait, it gets even better: you also got ripped off by the dealer.

 

For example, every dealer in LA was selling the Ford Focus with all the goodies including A/C, auto transmission, power windows, etc for $12,500 the month before the "cash for clunkers" program started.

 

When "cash for clunkers" came along, they stopped discounting them and instead sold them at the list price of $15,500. So, you paid $3000 more than you would have the month before. (Honda, Toyota, and Kia played the same list price game that Ford and Chevy did).

 

So lets do the final tally here:

 

You traded in a car worth: $3500

 

You got a discount of: $4500

 

---------

 

Net so far +$1000

 

But you have to pay: $1350 in taxes on the $4500 (Depending on your tax bracket)

 

--------

 

Net so far: -$350

 

And you paid: $3000 more than the car was selling for the month before

 

----------

 

Net -$3350

 

We could also add in the additional taxes (sales tax, state tax, etc.) on the extra $3000 that you paid for the car, along with the 5 years of interest on the car loan but lets just stop here.

 

So who actually made out on the deal? The feds collected taxes on the car along with taxes on the $4500 they "gave" you. The car dealers made an extra $3000 or more on every car they sold along with the kickbacks from the manufacturers and the loan companies. The manufacturers got to dump lots of cars they could not give away the month before. And many of the poor gullible consumers got saddled with even more debt that many cannot afford.

 

Somebody convinced Joe consumer that he was getting $4500 in "free" money from the "government" when in fact Joe was giving away his $3500 car and paying an additional $3350 for the privilege.


Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

HOBBITS are Tolkien Minorities

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Education and Insanity?

In the early nineteenth century, a group of reformers set out to establish a system of public education in the United States. At the time, in rural areas, schools closed in the spring and fall and ran all summer long, so that children could help out in the busy planting and harvesting seasons. In the city, many schools mirrored the long and chaotic schedules of the children’s working-class parents. The reformers wanted to make sure that all children went to school and that public school was comprehensive, meaning that all children got enough schooling to learn how to read and write and do basic arithmetic and function as productive citizens.

But, those early educational reformers were also tremendously concerned that children did not get too much schooling. In 1871 the commissioner of education published a report on the “Relation of Education to Insanity.” During a study of 1,741 cases of insanity it was determined “over-study” was responsible for 205 of them. The report included, “Education lays the foundation of a large portion of the causes of mental disorder.” Another pioneer of public education believed that working students too hard would create a “most pernicious influence upon character and habits. . . Not infrequently is health itself destroyed by over-stimulating the mind.” Education journals reported constant worries about overtaxing students or blunting their natural abilities through too much school work.

Historian Kenneth Gold wrote: The reformers strove for ways to reduce time spent studying, because long periods of respite could save the mind from injury. Hence the elimination of Saturday classes, the shortening of the school day, and the lengthening of vacation---all of which occurred over the course of the nineteenth century. Teachers were cautioned that “when [students] are required to study, their bodies should not be exhausted by long confinement, nor their minds bewildered by prolonged application.” Rest also presented particular opportunities for strengthening cognitive and analytical skills. As one contributor to the Massachusetts Teacher suggested, “it is when thus relieved from the state of tension belonging to actual study that boys and girls, as well as men and women, acquired the habit of thought and reflection, and of forming their own conclusions independently of what they are taught and the authority of others.”

And that’s the way it was.

Obama Black? White?

For president Obama to consider himself black he is talking about the color of his skin.I believe that is the defintion of a racist and is what MLK wanted people NOT to do. Interesting double standard.
 

Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

HOBBITS are Tolkien Minorities

Monday, September 21, 2009

If. . .

If George W.  Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be  able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said  this is more proof of how he inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?
 
If  George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of  dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have  approved?
        
If  George W. Bush had reduced your retirement  plan's holdings of GM stock by  90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have  approved?
     
If  George W.  Bush had made a joke at the expense  of the  Special Olympics, would you have  approved?
   
If  George W. Bush had given Gordon  Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when  Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful  and  historically significant gift, would you  have approved?
   
If  George W. Bush had given the Queen of  England an  iPod containing videos of  his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and  tacky? 
    
If  George W. Bush had bowed to the King of  Saudi  Arabia , would you  have approved?
  
If  George W. Bush had visited  Austria  and made  reference to the non-existent "Austrian language," would you   have brushed it off as a minor  slip? 
  
If  George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle  of advisers  with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes,  would you have approved? 
   
If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as  to  refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it   was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he   tried again, would you have winced in  embarrassment?
   
If George W.  Bush had mis-spelled the word "advice" would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as proof of what a dunce he is?
     
If George W.  Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel  to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?
     
If George W.  Bush's administration had okay'd Air  Force One flying low over millions of  people followed  by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread  panic, would you have wondered whether  they actually get what happened  on 9-11?   
   
If George W.  Bush had failed to send relief aid to  flood victims throughout  the Midwest with more people killed or  made homeless than in  New Orleans ,  would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of  racism and  incompetence? 
   
If  George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO  of a  major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority  to  do so, would you have  approved? 
    
If  George W Bush  had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than  two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you  have approved? 
  
If  George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?
   
So, tell  me again, what is it about Obama that makes  him so brilliant and  impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't  worry.. He's done all  this in 5 months -- so you'll have three years  and seven months  to come up with an answer. 
 

Thanks, John Jenkins
865-803-8179  cell
Gatlinburg, TN

Email: jrjenki@gmail.com
Website: http://www.greenbriersolutions.com  
Blog: http://littlepigeon.blogspot.com/

HOBBITS are Tolkien Minorities

Friday, September 18, 2009

Involvement

Some years ago two Princeton University psychologists, John Darley and Daniel Batson, decided to conduct a study inspired by the biblical story of the Good Samaritan.

 

Darley and Batson met with a group of seminarians, individually, and asked each one to prepare a short, extemporaneous talk on a given biblical theme, then walk over to a nearby building to present it. Along the way to the presentation, each student ran into a man slumped in an alley, head down, eyes closed, coughing and groaning. Darley and Batson introduced three variables into the experiment, to make its results more meaningful. First, before the experiment even started, they gave the students a questionnaire about why they had chose to study theology.  Did they see religion as a means for personal and spiritual fulfillment? Or were they looking for a practical tool for finding meaning in everyday life? Then they varied the subject of the theme the students were asked to talk about. Some were asked to speak on the relevance of the professional clergy to the religious vocation. Others were given the parable of the Good Samaritan. Finally, the instructions given by the experimenters to each student varied as well.  In some cases, as he sent the students on their way the experimenter would look at his watch and say, "Oh you're late. They were expecting you a few minutes ago. We'd better get moving." In other cases, he would say, "It will be a few minutes before they're ready for you, but you might as well head over now."

 

If you ask people to predict which seminarians played the Good Samaritan (and subsequent studies have done just this) their answers are highly consistent. They almost all say that the students who entered the ministry to help people and those reminded of the importance of compassion by having just read the parable of the Good Samaritan will be the most likely to stop. Most or us, I think, would agree with those conclusions. In fact, neither of those factors made any difference. "It is hard to think of a context in which norms concerning helping those in distress are more salient than for a person thinking about the Good Samaritan, and yet it did not significantly increase helping behavior," Darley and Batson concluded. "Indeed on several occasions, a seminary student going to give his talk on the parable of the Good Samaritan literally stepped over the victim as he hurried on his way." The only thing that really mattered was whether the student was in a rush. Of the group that was, 10 percent stopped to help. Of the group who knew they had a few minutes to spare, 63 percent stopped.

 

What this study is suggesting is that convictions of your heart and the actual contents of your thoughts are less important, in the end, in guiding your actions that the immediate context of your behavior. The words "Oh, you're late" had the effect of making someone who was ordinarily compassionate into someone who was indifferent to suffering---of turning someone, in that particular moment, into a different person.

  

There Comes a Time in Every Person’s Life When a Decision is Required.

There comes a time in every person's life when a decision is required. And that decision, should you make it, will have a far-reaching effect on generations not yet born. Your example, your actions, even one decision can literally change the world.

One decision can literally change the world.

July second, eighteen sixty three, a school teacher from Maine was in the fight of his life.  Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain, formerly a professor or rhetoric from Bowdoin College, currently a thirty-four-year-old colonel in the union army. The place is Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.

Chamberlain's troops were facing the Army of Northern Virginia, commanded by General Robert Lee. After five bloody attacks from the Rebels, Chamberlain's troops could not hold them off any longer.

More than half his regiment was dead, and many of the remaining soldiers were wounded. He was outnumbered more than five to one, and the last skirmish had taken place on both sides of the wall, face-to-face. He did not know how his troops had pushed the Rebels back down the hill. He found out later his men had been punching the enemy with their fists.

A quick survey told him there were less than two bullets per man remaining. For all intents and purposes his troops, the Twentieth Main was out of ammunition. He could see the attackers were preparing for a final assault. Looking at what seemed to be certain death, Chamberlain's officers advised retreat.

Chamberlain did not respond. He was thinking that the cost of staying where he was would be the same as running away.

His brother screamed at him to 'Give an order."

And so he did. Chamberlain he ordered his troops to 'fix bayonets!' His men thought he was crazy.

Then someone down the line yelled,"'They're coming!"

Chamberlain yelled "Fix bayonets, and Charge!" Chamberlain drew his sword, jumped on top of the wall and with the enemy less than 50 yards away, shouted "Charge!"

The men of the Twentieth Maine Regiment, the pride of the Army of the Potomac, poured over the wall and followed the schoolteacher into history.

The Confederate troop, upon seeing the leader of the opposition climb the wall, stopped unsure what was happening.  When Chamberlain pointed his sword at them and yelled "Charge!" they turned and ran. Many threw down loaded weapons. They were sure these must be reinforcements. It never occurred to them that a beaten regiment would charge.

In less than ten minutes, the ragged group under Chamberlain's command, without ammunition, captured the entire regiments of the Fifteenth Alabama and the Forty-seventh Alabama, more than four hundred men. It all happened because one man made a decision to charge.

And one decision that you make, can literally change the world.

You might be thinking that Colonel Joshua Chamberlain changed the outcome of only one small part of the battle. Consider this.

It was an accepted as fact, that at the time of the Battle of Gettysburg, the Union was losing badly. Confederate troops had taken Fort Sumter, routed the Union army at Manassas. Lee had won major victories at Richmond in the Battles of the Seven days and again at Manassas in the Second Battle of Bull Run. The South had won at Chancellorsville and crushed General Burnside at Fredericksburg.

Had the south been victorious at Gettysburg, historians agree that the war would have been over by the end of the summer. The Confederate States of America were one victory away from winning the war. But they did not win.

The schoolteacher from Maine was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for his decision at Little Round Top. His commanding officers determined that the actions of this one man saved the Union army from certain destruction. His decision had turned the tide of the battle. Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain turned the tide of the war.

If the South had won there would be no America as we have today. There would have been two possibly three countries existing in our place.  The world would not have a country beg enough and strong enough to feed the other nations of the world. There would be no superpower available to defend weaker countries against those who would limit their freedom.

When Hitler swept across Europe, when Hirohito invaded the islands of the Pacific, when Saddam Hussein's armies rolled into Kuwait, a United States of America was there to stop them.  We were there because of one man, with his back to the wall, a man whose only option appeared to be to retreat. The world as it exists today is largely the result of a decision to charge—made by a schoolteacher over a hundred years ago.

Joshua Chamberlain made a decision that changed the world but it also held personal rewards. He led successful campaigns until the end of the war. He was cited four separate times for bravery in action and was promoted by special order of Ulysses S. Grant to brigadier general for heroism at Petersburg.  A few months later for heroism at Five Forks, he was promoted to Major General.

From all Union Officers, President Lincoln chose Chamberlain to have the honor of accepting the Confederate surrender at Appomattox. There he stunned the world with a show of forgiveness and respect as he ordered his troops to attention, saluting General Robert E Lee and his army.

Back home in Maine, Chamberlain was elected governor in what is, to this day, the largest majority in the history of the state. He was reelected three times until he finally stepped down and accepted the position of president of Bowdoin College.

An interesting benefit of a person's decision to charge is the presence of a hedge of thorns. Mentioned in the Bible, a hedge of thorns is divine protection placed upon the person who is destined to make a difference. Until you have accomplished what you were put here to do, you will not, you cannot be harmed.  Joshua Chamberlain, on that hill in Pennsylvania, with his decision not yet made and all his victories before him, was wrapped in the protection of a hedge of thorns.

I have a copy of the contents of a letter addressed to the Honorable Governor Joshua L. Chamberlain. It arrived at the statehouse in Maine, several years after the war.

 

Dear Sir:

 

I want to tell you of a little passage in the Battle of Round Top, Gettysburg, concerning you and me, which I am now glad of. Twice in that fight I had your life in my hands. I got a safe place between two rocks, and drew bead fair and square on you. You were standing in the open behind the center of your line, full exposed. I knew your rank by your uniform and actions, and I thought it a mighty good thing to put you out of the way. I rested my gun on the rock and took steady aim. I started to pull the trigger, but some queer notion stopped me. Then I got ashamed of my weakness and went through the same motions again. I had you, perfectly certain. But that same queer something shut right down on me. I couldn't pull the trigger, and gave it up---that is, your life. I am glad of it now, and hope you are.

 

Yours truly,

A member of the Fifteenth Alabama

 

Our story, our circumstances may not be as dramatic as those of Joshua Chamberlain, but the stakes are exactly the same. There comes a time in every person's life when a decision is required. And that decision, should we make it, will have a far-reaching effect on generations yet unborn. One decision that we make will literally change the world.

 

A decision to charge………so do it. Change your life. Charge…………..

 

Sweat the Small Stuff

Have you ever been bitten by an elephant? How about a mosquito? It's the small stuff that will get you.

A few years ago, a squirrel climbed onto the Metro-North Railroad power lines near New York City. He set off an electrical surge, which weakened an overhead bracket. The bracket allowed a wire to dangle toward the tracks. The wire tangled in a train that tore down all the lines. As a result, forty-seven thousand commuters were stranded in Manhattan for hours that evening.

Remember the Hubble Space Telescope? It was conceived in 1946 and cost $2.5 billion to produce. Yet when it was launched into orbit, NASA discovered that a particular lens had been ground 1/1000th of an inch less than it should have been. That "little thing" until it was repaired by astronauts, rendered the most expensive telescope in history no better than a good one on the ground.

Then there was Napoleon: a tiny part of the battle became immensely important to Napoleon when he defeated Wellington at Waterloo. But wasn't Waterloo Napoleon's greatest defeat?

On the eighteenth of June 1815, Napoleon did indeed suffer his greatest defeat---an unmitigated disaster---at Waterloo. But that was only after he had won!

Napoleon had brilliantly outmaneuvered Wellington's 77,000 men---this in addition to the more than 100,000 Prussians nearby. Together, those armies easily outnumbered Napoleon's 76,000, but when he got in between them, Napoleon prevented the two from combining. He had already beaten the Prussians two days before, so he detached a part of his force to hold them at bay while pointing the rest of his army toward Wellington and the British.

Napoleon began the battle at a bit after eleven in the morning with an artillery barrage and an initial assault against the British right flank. Pushing back and forth most of the day, at one point Napoleon watched from a hillside as his troops pushed past Wellington's lines, capturing almost all of the 160 British cannons.

Muzzle-loading cannons were packed with black gunpowder, wadding, and a projectile of some sort. The touchhole of the cannon was then contacted with a flaming torch, which ignited the powder and fired the cannon.

It was customary in those days for several of the troops to carry small metal rods---nails---with them in the event they overran the enemy's guns. The metal rods were then hammered into the cannon's touchhole, rendering it useless. When Napoleon's men overran Wellington's position---and his cannons---it became immediately apparent that there were no spikes among his troops. As Napoleon screamed from the hilltop for the cannons to be destroyed, he watched Wellington's men retake the guns and turn them on their attackers. Napoleon was defeated…and all for lack of a fistful of nails.

·         Sacajawea was the daughter of a Shoshone.

·         Sacagawea was born in the eastern part of what is now the state of Idaho. Her people, the Lemhi Shoshone, or Snake People, spent much of the year traveling in small groups.

·         When Sacagawea was around 10 years old, her group was camped near the three forks of the Missouri River. Suddenly, a band of Hidatsa attacked. The Shoshone bows and arrows were useless against the Hidatsa's rifles. Sacagawea and others were captured and taken back to the Hidatsa villages near present-day Stanton, North Dakota.

·         Within a few years of arriving at the Hidatsa village, Sacagawea was sold or lost in a gambling wager to Toussaint Charbonneau, a French-Canadian trader. The marriage was not a love match. Charbonneau had the typical trader's attitude toward Indian women--they were very good workers.

·         Sacajawea was about 16 years old when she and her husband, a French-Canadian trapper named Toussaint Charbonneau, joined the group of explorers.

·         Sacajawea was pregnant at the time with her first child.

·         During the trip, she gave birth to a son. On February 11th, 1805, Sacagawea went into a long, difficult labor. She gave birth to a boy, whom Charbonneau named Jean Baptiste. She called him Pomp, meaning 'first born' in Shoshone.

·         When the Corps of Discovery encountered Shoshone Indians, Sacajawea discovered that their leader was her brother, Cameahwait. Sacagawea learned that most of her family were dead. Only two brothers and her oldest sister's child remained.

·         Lewis and Clark purchased horses from the Shoshones. They used the horses to cross the Rocky Mountains.

·         Sacajawea contributed to the success of the Lewis and Clark Expedition by serving as an interpreter, finding edible plants, and saving important documents and supplies when a boat capsized.

 

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Carter is the Racist

Anyone who considers President Obama a Negro, or Black person is the racist. He is as much white as he is black. Carter is truly talking about the color of Obama's skin and that is against everything MLK jr stood for.

Jimmy Carter is an old white man from rural Georgia. He probably thinks of Obama as a "N" who does not know his place. And thinks everyone else thinks so too.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Advertising's Conventional Wisdom

Listerine was invented in the nineteenth century as a powerful surgical antiseptic. It was sold, in distilled form, as a floor cleaner and a cure for gonorrhea. Success did not come until the 1920s when it was pitched as a solution for "chronic halitosis"---an obscure medical term for bad breath. The advertising featured young women and men eager for marriage but turned off by their mate's rotten breath. Until that time, bad breath was not conventionally considered such a catastrophe.Listerine did not make mouthwash as much as it made halitosis. In seven years revenues went from $155,000 to $ 8 million.

Conventional Wisdom

John Kenneth Galbraith coined the phrase "conventional wisdom." He did not consider it a compliment. He wrote "We associate truth with convenience, with what most closely accords with self-interest and personal well-being or promises best to avoid awkward effort or unwelcome dislocation of life. We also find highly acceptable what contributes most to self-esteem." Economic and social behaviors "are complex, and to comprehend their character is mentally tiring. Therefore we adhere, as though to a raft, to those ideas which represent our understanding." In his view conventional wisdom must be convenient, comfortable, and comforting---though not necessarily true. While it would be silly to argue that conventional wisdom is never true noticing where it may be false or possibly sloppy or self-interested thinking is worth questioning.

During the 1980s advocates for the homeless told us there were 3 million homeless Americans. We all sat up and took notice but more than 1 of every 100 people were homeless? That seemed high but experts said it. The same expert said 45 homeless people die each second---which would mean 1.4 billion dead homeless every year. At the time the U.S. population was about 25 million. Even if they meant to say that one homeless person died every forty-five seconds, that's still 701,000 dead homeless people every year. Roughly one-third of all deaths in the United States. Makes one wonder.. When pressed on the figure of 3 million homeless, they admitted it was a fabricated number. Journalists had been hounding them for a specific number and they did not want them to walk away empty-handed.

Watch your television sets for examples of "conventional wisdom.".

Thinking like a criminal

The longer one is a believer the less they think like an unbeliever. Not being criminals limits our understanding of how criminals think. We might want to give it a try when it comes to our justice system.

Given the rarity with which executions are carried out in the is country and the long delays in doing so, no reasonable criminal is deterred by the threat of execution. Even though capital punishment quadrupled within a decade there were only 478 executions in the entire United States during the 1990s. Any parent knows the difference between deterrent and empty threat, "Okay, I'm going to count to ten and this time I'm really going to punish you." Among prisoners on death row, the annual execution rate is 2 percent---compared with the 7 percent annual chance of dying faced by a member of a typical gang that distributes crack. If life on death row is safer than life on the streets its hard to believe the fear of execution is a driving force in a criminal's calculus.

Sometime I will have to explain how legalizing abortions in the 70s led to a major drop in crime in the 90s.

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

Robert Todd Lincoln's Knack for Being Near Assassinations

Lee's surrender wasn't the only history Lincoln ended up witnessing, although things got a bit grislier for him after Appomattox. As he arrived back in Washington in April 1865, Lincoln's parents invited him to go see Our American Cousin at Ford's Theater with them. The young officer was so exhausted after his journey that he begged off so he could get a good night's sleep. That night, of course, John Wilkes Booth shot Lincoln's father, and Robert Todd was with the celebrated president when he passed away the next morning.

By 1881, Lincoln's political lineage and prominence as a lawyer qualified him for a national office, and he became Secretary of War under the newly inaugurated James A. Garfield. That July, Lincoln was scheduled to travel to Elberon, New Jersey, by train with the President, but the trip never took off. Before Lincoln and Garfield's train could leave the station, Charles Guiteau shot Garfield, who died of complications from the wound two months later.

Oddly, that wasn't all for Lincoln, though. Two decades passed without a presidential assassination, but Lincoln's strange luck reared its head again in 1901. Lincoln traveled to Buffalo at the invitation of President William McKinley to attend the Pan-American Exposition. Although he arrived a bit late to the even, Lincoln was on his way to meet McKinley when anarchist Leon Czolgosz shot the president twice at close range.

Following these three bits of bad luck Lincoln refused to attend any presidential functions.

Thursday, September 03, 2009

Speak in Such a Way That You Make Others Want to Listen / ---Steven K. Scott

For most people, speaking means simply saying whatever they feel like saying. People say what they think or feel as think or feel it, regardless of its validity or appropriateness. When you have something that you really want the other person to clearly understand and embrace, you need to communicate in a way that makes it palatable. A wise man or woman does whatever it takes to make what they have to say easy to swallow.
 

"The tongue of the wise makes knowledge acceptable, But the mouth of fools spouts folly." Proverbs 15:2